Easily but it would probably capsize without considerably more ballast.
2007-07-09 08:16:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Del Piero 10 7
·
8⤊
1⤋
If it floats on water it'll certainly float on mercury and, your question on ballast makes sense in as much that, on mercury, the ship will float with a draft about 13.6 times higher than on water. Gold being slightly heavier than Platinum and lighter than Mercury would be the best as a ballast and gold with about half the displacement of the ship should do it.
(A very hypothetical question with a very hypothetical answer).
2007-07-09 09:29:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Norrie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since a battleship floats in water, it will most certainly float in mercury, which is much more dense.
13.534 g·cm^−3 is the density of mercury
7.86 g·cm^−3 is the density of iron
Even if you melt the battleship down into a ball, it will still float in mercury.
PS: Yes, I've received gifts from Yahoo Answers, including an invitation to a very nice party for major contributors. It was a pleasant, heartwarming gesture, but still represents an extremely low rate of pay for the time I spend helping people who want to learn. That's the reward. For 10,000 points plus a dollar, I can buy a cup of coffee in some places.
2007-07-09 08:18:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Frank N 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Oh, without a doubt. Mercury is denser than water. A battleship is less dense than water. Therefore, by the transitive property, a battleship will float in mercury.
2007-07-09 08:15:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brian L 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Battleships float in water, so they will certainly float in mercury.
2007-07-09 08:15:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by ZikZak 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
when you take into account that within a ship, there is alot of air, the "average" density of the battleship is less dense than that of water, i.e. water's density is about 1,000 kg/m cubed. where mercury's density is about 13,630 kg/m cubed.
2007-07-09 14:51:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ftm821 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It floats in water doesn't it? Mercury is NUMEROUS times more dense, so of course it will float in mercury.
2007-07-09 08:18:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, it floats on water, mercury has density 13.6 times that of water.
2007-07-09 08:16:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would certainly be buoyant enough. It might have some dynamic stability problems, but that's another question.
2007-07-09 08:16:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by B B 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not if its metacentric height were too great.
2007-07-09 09:03:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋