Bush has kill more innocent people than Saddam. So who is the threat?

Question

1.- Where's Osama Bin Laden? Wasn't him the main reason we went over there? are we still looking for him?
2.- Where are the weapons of mass destruction that all of them claim?
Yes you are going to say another democrat or another ignorant bla bla bla, just wait when your brother, father, uncle, son dies in that stupid war and just watch how your way of thinking will change.

Answer 1

Firstly, the guy above me seems to have a bit of a problem with capitalizing random words such as MUSLIMS. You say it, and you obviously want to show your prejudice and hatred against Muslims. Why don't you educate yourself and stop generalizing a whole group of people into one category.


People are so blinded. Bush is a terrorist himself. There's no excuse for invading a country and killing hundreds of thousands of it's civilians, and making their children the victims of war and hatred. Not only that, but sending our very own soldiers into life threatning positions and not even telling them why exactly they are there. Bush does not stick to his words, he doesn't even know what his words are. He has heartless robots blindly following him around and telling him what to do. Just a few years ago, he said this war cannot be "won". Now he's saying the U.S is going to "win" the war. How are we going to win, who exactly are we defeating, and is it really worth it in the end? Now they took out Saddam Hussein, someone they basically fueled to do what he did by giving him weapons and support to go against Iran. They even gave billions of dollars and training to Osama Bin Laden, and used him as an excuse to start war. Now he's left them in the dust and they dont know what to do. This regime must be driven out!

Answer 2

I think the first guy is spot on, people like you would have found a way too sympathise with Pol Pot. Before you ask any question I think your 'evidence' should be pretty water tight, and yours is dire. Saddam was a sadistic despot, FACT. Bush is an elected leader of our allies so to compare the two, is at best naive and worst treacherous. I expect this to fall on deaf ears, you liberals seem to think you 'understand' everything, although your knowledge of current affairs & history questions this. To answer your question, President Bush is not trying to kill me, my family and fellow countrymen, so I know who I'd rather support. The sheer concept of War unfortunatly means innocent people will be killed but as with WWII, the person who caused the conflict is usually the one too blame. Bush didn't organize 9/11 or butcher thousands of his own people, he is retaliating to an attack on his nation. So who is the tyrant then or are you sympathising with Bin Laden and co as well.

You 'students' make me sick, either support our troops who are bogged down in a shi thole of a war, WHICH WE NEVER STARTED, or shut up

Answer 3

The fantasy world of the libs must be clouding too many judgments. Bush has not killed one person in Iraq but the nay Sayers love to claim He has. Saddam was responsible for the death and abuse of millions. Not to mention the use of poison gas on the Iranians and His own people. Yet this same question keeps popping up which only serves to prove how ignorant people can be.

Answer 4

Bush is the threat. All he believes in is sending soldiers to the battle field while he tries on his pink dancing dress! There was a story about a soldier receiving the purple heart after losing his right leg. They had a picture of that pansy pinning that piece of metal to the soldiers shirt. The last time I checked a piece of metal isn't worth a leg!!! I would've told him where he could put that medal!!!!

Answer 5

THEYVE DEFINATLY GOT WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION COS WE PROBABLY SOLD THEM TO THEM

and i think youll find , if we are on the subject of whos killed the most people, that in fact you are talking utter utter sh1t,
MUSLIMS have killed more people than all the world wars combined, do you homework before slating those who f*cking feed them

Answer 6

if you were a citizen of iraq, any of us, then i'm sure your view of who the terrorists are would be completely different...if there were foriegn troups from ANYWHERE in our country drawing more terrorists/insurgents to your our front yards we would consider them to be terrorists FOR SURE!...and we would want them OUT!
this whole 'WAR' started over control of oil resources and that is why it continues....the administration only seems to be 'concerned' about bringing'freedom' and 'democracy' to the countries that have oil...this little fact tells on them...it's about oil, period end!

Answer 7

Name one.

Answer 8

prove your statement with facts . remember the senate and the house both voted for the war.