2007-07-09 06:15:12 · 8 answers · asked by purplepeace59 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Dysfunctional programme. A DR WHO movie.
2007-07-09 06:22:54 · update #1
Dr. Who pretty much sucks. I'm sure the suckage factor played into Spielberg's decision.
2007-07-09 06:24:10 · answer #1 · answered by pm 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This was back in the early '90s. Doctor Who had been off air for quite a few years, and there was little prospect of the BBC reviving it.
Spielberg was approached actually to make a new series, with decent storylines and high production values. Negotiations didn't come to anything, and when a Hollywood-style TV movie was actually made in 1996, it wasn't a great success - making a Spielberg revamp even less likely.
All of which made the recent Russell T Davies resurrection unexpected, and very welcome.
2007-07-09 06:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel R 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How would anyone here know the answer to this question? And I have to ask the same question someone else did. What is a Dr. Movie?
2007-07-09 06:23:43 · answer #3 · answered by Toodeemo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He already has, it was god awful.
It was about 1996.
The Dr. was Sylvester McCoy / Paul McCann,
The Master was Eric Roberts.
2007-07-09 06:24:48 · answer #4 · answered by Efnissien 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
mr speilberg....directing a dr who movie....mmmmm it doesnt quite gel does it....dr who is quite shite....so calm down and face the wall with a pointed hat on ya head!!!
2007-07-09 06:35:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Erm...perhaps he was busy.
And what's a Dr. Movie ??
2007-07-09 06:19:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would assume that since he would be hamstrung into what the movie could or could not do, he passed on it.
2007-07-09 06:26:50 · answer #7 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He didn't feel like it?
2007-07-09 06:23:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋