"Cogito, ergo sum". Or is it "I am therefore I think" ... Bear the question in mind. In failure find sucess! (they say failure is success turned inside out)... In dissaster try and find Laughter... In sickness discover what it means to be healthy... When faced with hatred try and see love.
All of us have positive and negative experiences, try and answer the question as it relates to you.... that way in asking you the question I am doing the opposite for I return your answer to you...
Try and live life this way and above all have fun with my question!
:-)
2007-07-09 04:52:08 · 6 answers · asked by David 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
To discard is to think discretely. To feel does not
require proactive thought; passively feeling through senses.
An individual can sense things all day long, but if those
sensed things aren't interpreted then what thought
has been implemented. The thought to disregard
discretion. Therefore, any "I" forces the requisite
of thought to be "I". Otherwise, "I" wouldn't be "I",
"I" would be the world; a passive individual acts
only as a receptacle for the happenings of the world.
Which illuminates the premise Descartes had for
creating the phrase "I think, I am"; to know that
his(and those who observed him) discretion wasn't
deceived by the external. "I am therefore I think" acts
before thinking, and is always a step behind knowing.
Feel, think, act is embodied by "I think, I am". I am what
I feel and what I do, and I think between the two to represent
my being as being of myself.
2007-07-09 07:28:20 · answer #1 · answered by active open programming 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since negativity seems to be so popular, opposit thinking should make you happy indeed. Just breaking out of the sad old mindset pumps me up. The world seems to be going backwards and thinking the same thoughts and expecting different results seems to be the world condition. I can find some truth in what everyone says where I used to only find fault. Then I saw popular knowledge as ninety five percent wrong, now I see the value in people, they're more wonderful and less aweful then I thought. The mind thinks in pictures and evaluates all it can imagine without bias. I see that as the scientific method, what science is, although the same process can and is used in every discipline. Say, as a wise person, I think that you would like Eckhart Tolle, if you have read any of his stuff. He get's on the NY Times best seller lists. You can get a 2005 book at the library.
War, intellectual hopefully.
2007-07-09 05:07:25 · answer #2 · answered by hb12 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If that were to happen you would have a distorted vision of life simply because you'd only take the opposite of the proposed statement and not necessarily grasp the gist of the statement.
To truly understand a process you must be neither for or against it but you must be aware of it.
By simply being aware or knowledgeable of the subject one attains a greater level of awareness than by simply taking information about the subject (that is taking information and discarding that information and adhering to the opposite of such information) there is a set back.
When you discard, you lose a fragment of important information. Now there is nothing wrong with thinking the opposite but the greatest fault occurs in discarding the piece because then you become unaware of the entire process.
2007-07-09 05:57:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I had to think of not answering your question...you're right, it's a lot of fun!0!
Good luck!
2007-07-09 05:27:48 · answer #4 · answered by Alex 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It can't be happend
unless
I am sick.
Please don't make me sick for some thing which will never happen till I'm ok.
2007-07-09 05:53:04 · answer #5 · answered by Mustansar Dar 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"ÐебÑло Ð±Ñ ÑÑаÑÑÑÑ, да неÑÑаÑÑÑе помогло."
Nothing happens in vain, we couldn't understand what is good without bad things that happened to us.
2007-07-09 05:08:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋