Who can prove 9/11 didn't involve the powers that be?

Question

No official inquiry to speak of........
Bunch of unanswered questions.......

For those that talk of proving a 'negative'... There are no negatives... There are too many classified information that the powers that be won't release... If they did. then the rest of us (not sheeple) could make up our minds.

Answer 1

The evidence of conspiracy is overwhelming. Our media is under total control. Our congress,both sides have sold out. About all we can do is keep spreading the word. Constant pressure will take it's toll eventually. The whole mess is a pretty big pill to swallow for the general public, but I think awareness is starting to permeate the masses.

Answer 2

As many have said, you can't prove a negative and the burden of proof is on those who make the accusation.

On top of this, though, let's add the following to consider.

Which is more plausible?

(a) Islamic Fundamentalists, who already have a history of suicide bombings and have a hatred of the West, were able to gain access to 4 planes and smash them into important buildings.

or

(b) Our government is somehow responsible for encouraging this to happen.

This isn't proof, but logic dictates that the 9/11 attacks fit much more into the Al Qaeda ideology and tactics than some sort of Oliver Stone conspiracy.

Answer 3

Who can prove that aliens didn't do it? Or that Elvis didn't come back from the grave to do it?

I mean, one of those must have happened right? Because if we ignore the numerous official inquiries into it.. we can say there were no official inquiries.

And, of course, despite the fact that we know about 99.9% of what happened.. there is that .1% left unknown.. so obviously Elvis and the aliens are involved.

Sadly.. this theory is as probable as the idiocy which you conspiracy nuts rant on and on about.

Answer 4

There is something a bit sinister about how much information is actually prevented from being released to the public concerning the events of 9/11. Something just isn’t right, and you don’t have to be a conspiracy nut to arrive at this conclusion. When a child, who was previously open to a parent enter his or her room, all of a sudden is vehement about not letting that parent intrude on his or her room, it is probably because he or she has something to hide. The same goes for our government.

Though I am not ready to accept everything posited by the more popular theories that accuse our government of actually orchestrating 9//11, the most notable being those assertions put forth in the documentary “Loose Change”, I think some of their arguments are meritorious, especially in light of the conspicuous silence of our government and its reticence to make information concerning those events accessible to the American people.

At this juncture, the popular line of defense that is trotted out is that some things are kept from the people for national security reasons. To these people who buy into this argument, and to those who promote it, I wonder exactly what sort of information about PAST events, could ever jeopardize our future national safety? I guarantee you they cannot come up with one tidbit of information that could come from PAST events that could possibly put our future in a state of danger. I understand refraining from divulging specific military and law enforcement strategies that are to be implemented at some FUTURE date, because the release of that type of information could comprise our security, but the details of PAST events cannot.

To those who say that our government would never be involved in the destruction of its own citizenry in order to further its military and geopolitical objectives, I say take a cursory look at history. Everything from the McCarthy era, to lies about WMDs and Saddam’s links to Al Qaeda, attest to a government that will resort to the destruction of lives, even if it is American lives, in order to further its plans.

Wake up America, and be more skeptical, or you will have a government that will run all over your. Blind credulity in authority maybe a laudable trait for children, but it is unbecoming of an adult electorate.

Answer 5

It's always difficult if not impossible to disprove a negative. However, there's a lot of proof that the Bush administration ignored dire, but somewhat unspecific, warnings.

"Report Says FAA Got 52 Warnings Before 9/11"
Associated Press
Friday, February 11, 2005

"The Federal Aviation Administration received repeated warnings in the months before Sept. 11, 2001, that al Qaeda hoped to attack airlines, according to a previously undisclosed report by the commission that investigated the terrorist attacks.

The report detailed 52 such warnings to FAA leaders between April 1 and Sept. 10, 2001, about the terrorist organization and its leader, Osama bin Laden"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13203-2005Feb10.html

Answer 6

Saudi Arabia = Classified

$$$$$

Answer 7

The 9/11 commission was an official inquiry.

And the questions have all been answered.

The San Francisco bridge collapse proved what every sane person already knows, fire melts steel. Your anti-American sentiments are well known, I didn't realize you had become a conspiracy cultist as well.

Answer 8

You can't prove a "negative". I would think even someone as biased as you are would know that. The problem is, you can't "prove" any tie in. I thought we were "innocent until proven guilty" in America. The burden of proof is on you and your equally obtuse conspiracy morons.

Answer 9

No, I don't think the administration had anything to do with the death of its own citizens. But, at the same time there was an awful lot of finger pointing. I think we've beat this dead horse long enough.

Answer 10

can you ever actually prove anything? I could throw 1000 reindeer off a building and watch them go splat.. that doesn't prove that on December 24 eight of them don't fly around the world.

I find there are things worth my time to think about.. and then there's everything else.

Answer 11

When you can prove that LBJ didn't have Kennedy assinated
Elvis is still alive
The moon landing was a fake
Then we can talk.