I think that Obama is too inexpirenced, and too much a liability to be on the ticket, I think Richardson should be on the ticket to get other swing states, but honestly 95% of the Obama supporters will click Clinton on the ballot, even if they do not like her.
2007-07-09 03:54:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Two months ago I would have said that Clinton/Obama is the way to go, and it still may be. A lot of people think of it as the Democratic Dream Ticket. I think it could work very well, but I think also that Richardson or Biden are good picks.
You are right though, the liberals in the party don't like Clinton, mostly because she wants to leave residual troops in Iraq to protect our interests. But they will vote for her when faced with voting for a Republican instead. Obama is inexperienced and that's why no matter how many contributions he garners he will keep showing that inexperience. Like he has in the debates for instance. But I don't think he's a liability. Right now Clinton/Obama is still the ticket of most Democrat's dreams. That could change over the coming months though, there's still so far to go in this race.
2007-07-09 05:58:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great idea, but it'll never happen. Too many party insiders are still convinced Gore would have won in 2000 if he hadn't had "that damned Jew" on the ticket. So there's no way they're going to put a black man on the ticket this time, in any position! The woman on top thing is controversial enough, although personally, I've never had a problem with a woman on top! But the party insiders control everything, and I think you have more of a chance of seeing Bill in the #2 spot than Barak!
2007-07-09 04:39:49 · answer #2 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A Clinton-Obama ticket would be unbeatable. And after 8 years as Vice President, no one could then say Obama was insufficiently experienced. Sorry, Jeb, no more President Bushes.
2007-07-09 04:23:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No i do no longer go with to work out Obama on the cost ticket. I in basic terms think of Obama will do no good for this country. i'm balloting autonomous if Obama is on the cost ticket. Plus i am going with this country to vote for a third party it is for the middle classification. i'm in basic terms tried of the comparable politics in this country. autonomous is the only hop for actual exchange.
2016-10-20 10:11:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it will be a good idea for Hillary Clinton to have Obama as her running mate. Both are well-qualified to be leaders of a powerful country such as the U.S. and both of them can truly represent the majority of Americans.
2007-07-09 04:43:02 · answer #5 · answered by Belen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a supporter of either one. This is a horrible ticket and I'll tell you why: both are pro war, on the AIPAC/Israeli payroll and are simply pandering to liberals. The last thing we need is another four years of the Bush Clinton dynasty and another president that will further polarize the country.
2007-07-09 03:59:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
If you are a Repub any ticket with Clinton is a good thing as she can't win. It is a bad thing if you don't want another Rebub president.
2007-07-09 04:17:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
u won't see a clinton/obama ticket - neither one could stomach being number 2
2007-07-09 04:02:17 · answer #8 · answered by dwalkercpa 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hillary/Al 2008
2007-07-09 03:57:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
i will not vote for Hillary because most who do will vote for her because she is a woman - regardless of the fact that most of the problems the clinton's had in Arkansas were HER fault.
I will not vote for Obama because most of those who do will do so because he is half black - regardless of the fact that he has so darned little real political experience.
2007-07-09 04:02:29 · answer #10 · answered by Marvinator 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋