It is because of the small town folks who've never been to the city. It's also the baby boomer's fault. It proves my theory that Americans want somebody who TALK LIKE THEM, AND LOOK LIKE THEM. Plus it doesn't hurt to have a brother in high places who can manipulate votes in his state (not yet proven) I think he stole the election. WHAT REALLLY PISSES ME OFF IS ALL YOU DUMB DUMBS WHO SUPPORTED HIM AT FIRST, AND NOW YOU DON'T APPROVE. The smart ones knew that he was lying about WMD. And when you questioned his motives. YOU WERE CALLED unpatriotic!!!
He is by far the worst president in history.
2007-07-09 03:25:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
He does give a @#$@ about the troops.
he is money hungry.
We went to Somalia in 1992, we were there for 2 weeks. NO WHY?
Somalia has no profit gain!!!!
2007-07-09 03:27:24 · update #1
You George W. Bush fans are disgusting, you make me vomit. You truly are the scum of the Earth!
2007-07-09 03:37:52 · update #2
You mean he "doesn't" give a .... about the troops.
There were some fuzzy math irregularities in Ohio in 2004 when he wa re-selected. Some precincts turned in more votes than they had population.
But in Florida 2000, I blame the Nader voters as well as katherine harris. She removed names from voter lists that even looked similar to felons' names. (Just remove all of them with that name since we don't know which one did the crime.)
But there were also over 10,000 Nader voters in Florida. Thanks a lot folks. Maybe if 600 of those had voted for Gore 9/11 wouldn't have happened and we could still carry fingernail clippers on planes.
2007-07-09 03:37:18 · answer #1 · answered by topink 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You do know that decaf taste just as good as regular coffee.
If you look at the demographics of who voted for Bush they were those with a high school education up to PhDs.
The only groups Kerry won was those without high school or those who had PhDs.
As far as lying about WMDs is an old myth.
Many democrats believe the same thing.
Just because a conservative won doesn't mean he is the Anti-Christ.
2007-07-09 03:33:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
you know that bush put on a front when he was running for office. thats exactly what every other person does when they run. so everyone who suppoted him when in the begining is not a "DUMB DUMB" they were just making the right desicion at the time it needed to be made. why worry about the things that have happened in the past?? why not focus on trying to fix them in the future?? it's not doing anyone a dang bit of good to point fingers, now is it??
2007-07-09 03:33:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Although there are people who still say he stole the 2000 election, the 2004 election he won by a large margin on popularity and electoral college. Take a long hard look at facts for once and quit the whining !
2007-07-09 03:34:50 · answer #4 · answered by meathead 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
you can call us dumb dumbs,but what does that say about you and your party if we beat not once,but twice?
2007-07-09 08:19:35 · answer #5 · answered by mike hunt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having a total buffoon as his opponent didn't hurt.
2007-07-09 03:32:44 · answer #6 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Now THAT is a delayed reaction!!! Wow!
2007-07-09 04:08:37 · answer #7 · answered by Maudie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Damn, 4 years later you figured this out? What, did Mikey Moore blow you last night?
2007-07-09 03:33:09 · answer #8 · answered by Cub_Fanatic 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
maybe through our own stupidity we really DO deserve
Bilary for a third term.
2007-07-09 03:38:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
he is the only prez. that makes the average joe feel like he could one day be prez.
2007-07-09 03:57:06 · answer #10 · answered by JAMES A 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋