If you're not from the UK. Would you like a royal family and why ?

Answer 1

By this point, royal families are basically figureheads, aren't they? I wouldn't mind having a royal family, but then, I read too many books set in the Middle Ages, and I have a slightly romanticized view of kings, princesses, knights, etc.

Answer 2

My answer would be yes. I am from Germany (Bavaria to be exact, which was a kingdom until 1918), and I often feel that a monarchy is not the worst way of government, as long as there are provisions to hear the voice of the people.

Looking at today's politicans the world over, I see a bunch of power hungry individuals (some more, some less) who forget all about their promises made during election campaigns once they're established. With a hereditary ruler you might also get that sense of entitlement, but I really feel that ever since the Age of Enlightenment, monarchs also had a very pronounced sense of responsibility and duty towards their respective countries.

I remember reading about Konrad Adenauer, a famous German politican, who during his time in office had seen four separate governments: the German Empire under Emperor William II., the Weimar Republic, National Socialism and the Federal Republic of Germany. He served in three separate parliaments: the Prussian House of Lords (he was the mayor of Cologne and thus had a seat), the Prussian State Council of the Weimar Republic and finally as the first Chancellor of the FRG. A reporter once asked him what parliament was the most disciplined, the most pleasant, least corrupt and the most effective. His response? The Prussian House of Lords. As the name implies, this parliament was made up of aristocrats who inherited their titles and their powers, yet this democratically elected leader had nothing but admiration for their selfless and efficient service.

Answer 3

I would like a royal faimly in the USA as the 4th branch to check the other 3 branches of government because the 3 branch system doesnt always work when you have a 2 party system. The Crown does not have very much power but that power she has does have some teeth in it. She can appoint any one she wants as prime minister, she can fire (dismiss) parliment as well as any prime minister and block any law from passing. The powers are hardly ever used but she can use it when the government becomes ineffective because of politices. I mean she really has the power to say "get to work or get out" if she wanted to.

Answer 4

I'm not from the UK, I live in New Zealand. Over here the Queen of England "reigns but does not rule", meaning she has no real political influence. The Queen's role in New Zealand, to me, seems pretty pointless.
I certainly wouldn't want us to have our own royal family either. The last thing we need is another bunch of celebrities for the media to swarm on - let's face it, royalty hit the headlines for their private lives, not for politics.
I also think all important leaders should be elected, it's a daft idea to pass the role of king or queen on to the first-born. I mean, what if they're a complete moron?

Answer 5

I'm from the United States and we did have a royal family at one time. I think we will always feel close ties to the throne. It's just a new world and a new way of life that no longer speaks the queens/kings english. We no longer need to support the monarchy we now support crooked politicians that sit all day argue about everything and figure out ways to spend our tax dollar's on useless projects like building a bridge to no where.
DAGNABIT!!! I HAVE JUST DISCOVERED I think we need the monarchy back!
So my answer is YES!
Less bothersome and a whole lot better to watch in a parade.
LONG LIVE THE QUEEN!!!
LONG LIVE ENGLAND!

Answer 6

you realize what proportion Royal Engagements in basic terms Prince Charles finished final 365 days? 560! Princess Anne, greater proper typical because of the fact the Princess Royal? 534. The Queen? 417. Prince Philip? 354. You do understand that the Queen won't harm your existence, perfect? She has almost no means. She's head of the army, meaning she tells the army whilst they bypass to warfare. Technically. truly, the best minister might say "tell me to tell the Forces to bypass to warfare." and he or she would be able to. As a constitutional monarch, the Sovereign is had to assent to all charges exceeded via Parliament, on the advice of government ministers. In all of historic previous of constitutional monarchs, they have in no way denied one. She's additionally head of the church homes of england and Scotland. no longer lots means there. they're nonetheless around for all of the justifications I stated above. What might take place if we had a President? of direction they are unlikely to accomplish greater effective than 2400 engagements each and every 365 days. The charities might fall. Engagements that help lots, which incorporate a bombing in a city or something that the Royals bypass and refer to the family contributors of the killed human beings; the President will maximum in no way bypass to those households. She is a convention and enables us get by difficult situations via in basic terms being right here. How approximately we predict of of it this way: each and every Brit in basic terms will pay the Queen and her family contributors sixty two pence (approx.) consistent with 365 days! no longer very lots, is it? no longer in basic terms that, yet whilst we've been given rid of the monarchy the Queen does no longer carry each and every of the vacationer money (it truly is approximately 250 million money consistent with 365 days). in reaction on your "dayers" spiel, you're one in each and every of them. Please, each and every person, supply up asking this form of questions. I understand which you have an opinion, in basic terms take our (the Royalists) comments into attention, and don't scoff at why we've a monarchy. I in basic terms pronounced lots of good techniques on why we could constantly have one, and there will be lots greater stated above and below my answer.

Answer 7

No. I'm american. We left that all behind us, and I personally believe (or know rather) it would undermind our entire form of government, and america as our fore-fathers created would no longer exsist. On a different note, I do like the UK's royal family (with exceptions ;)).

Answer 8

Because of all of the pomp and circumstance! I was 12 when Prince Charles and Princess Diana got married and I saw the wedding on TV. I was hooked after that! It was such a fairytale :-) Now, I think that it is wonderful because of the work the Royals do for various charities.

Answer 9

I live in the U.S. and the House of Bush has had George the Liar on the throne for nearly eight years. Seriously, the idea of monarchy fell at the end of WW I and any remaining are simply a means to try and keep an antiquated car in the fast lane of a freeway.

Answer 10

Really a good royal family is symbol of past honour of a nation.