At the moment of the big bang........?

Question

would the base elements that were ejected in to space travel at a uniform speed and to a uniform distance or would heavier elements travel further or less. If this were so would it be correct to say that given as we dont know were we were in relation to the center, that our galaxy and the other local galaxies could possably be made up of differant elements to those Galaxies in far, far away space ( deep field galaxies ) and if so could these elements have different properties and reactions to earth elements and could disprove OUR basic understanding of astro-physics and einstiens theories.

Answer 1

Well according to what I learned in College

the very first particles of matter weren't anything like we have today. it was called proto-matter

there was many reactions leading up to the creation of quarks and leptons and then the formation of elemental
Hydrogen and all the other elements. Scientists believe
the HEAVY elements we try so hard to create today
were far more common in the early days of the Universe

The real big puzzle is how did our positive matter survive
as the most abundant and anti-matter seem to vanish to
a small percentage. I strongly believe the anti-matter
is the mass behind blackholes its still here just not
no real danger of positive matter encountering it

It is belived that proto-matter traveled faster than speed of light following the big bang. It can be shown in mathematics
to be possible no actual proof is available.

The biggest factors leading to the change to the matter we have today is the ever decreasing Gravity as things got furthur
apart and the lowering of the temperature of the soup.

Answer 2

The only thing created in the Big Bang was hydrogen and a little helium. The first stars that formed transformed the Hydrogen and Helium in the the base minerals that we know today, so everything is made of ancient star stuff. Early stars burned bright and fast lasting no more than 1 to 2 million years before becoming supernovas. With these large Supernova, carbon, iron and other minerals was blasted into the early universe.

What caused the early universe to form was not what came from but the temperature variations that was created during the initial expansion from the big bang.

The BBC did a program called Hyperspace about two years ago that spoke of this very thing, You can get it from Amazon.com for about 20 bucks.

Answer 3

We don't really know anything about the "moment" of the Big Bang---our understanding of physics does not extend past a point about a femtosecond after the Big Bang. At that time, the Universe had no center, and was already very large, perhaps infinite. The quarks had not yet combined into baryons, much less actual nuclei. Regions very far from our position in the Big Bang may very well have had different physics, but those regions are currently far beyond our event horizon and therefore unobservable.

Answer 4

At the moment of the big bang there existed a sub-atomic sized point of pure energy that lasted for 10-43 second before it interacted with the intense cold of the void. At that precise the expansion of the universe began and time and space came into being. Energy condensed into the smallest particles of matter which eventually formed the building blocks of everything, protons, neutrons and electrons.

Answer 5

Wow...You ask a very pointed and revolutionary kind of question...

I am of the opinion that there have been many bangs, not just one. Some have answered you suggesting that the only element available at the beginning was Hydrogen. I find that most dificult to believe.

You have certainly heard various discussions about how stars live, and then die in massive explosions. You have also seen how our Star has gravity sufficient to capture immensely heavy objects like the Earth, Mercury, Venus, etc., and hang onto them for long, long periods. So it is my belief that various stars have captured all kinds of materials out in space. Some have captured so much material over time that they fused (internally) all this material into various molten elements. When they finally captured so much material that they upset their own delicate balance and went critical, a massive explosion resulted = BANG.

If you sort of follow along with this idea, that, in my mind seems to suggest multiple BANGS might have occurred, not one, and gives us the reason for existence of giant galaxies far out into space, seemingly unrelated to those in the nearby vicinity - say within a Million Light Years. Given that Astromomers can "see" objets and galaxies out in space to a distance of 40 Billion Light Years with today's Optical and Radio Telescope Equipment, and the age of Earth having been estimated at 4.5 Billion Years...math suggests that a possibility of several BANGS, not one, might have occurred. I have encountered few people who suggest that huge blocks of mass may be accelerated up to, or beyond, the speed of light. So, I resolved the issue in my mind by considering the possibility of multiple BANGS over time... just like stars being born and dieing all the time...some just fizzling out, some exploding in massive bursts. If you add the dimension of "black holes" which accumulate material in huge amounts until some delicate balance is upset (also), maybe the explosion which we refer to was the explosion of one or more black holes. It is all a matter of great mystery and theory. Who knows for sure?

Answer 6

The very first tick of time gave us a space-time pulse of minimum size and duration.
The pulse repeated tripling it's essence on each pulse.
It expanded at an accelerating rate for one-thirty billionth of a second,the acceleration stopped when the radial velocity reached the speed of light.
This entity,2 cm in diameter contained no matter,no gravity,no electro-magnetism and no strong or weak forces.
It contained quantum flaws [The quantum effect] that would allow it to evolve into the universe we see to-day.
The farthest galaxies were just like ours but they don't exist to-day.

Answer 7

Elements are all made of the same atomic units, protons, neutrons, electrons, quarks, and so on. If there happened to be a more dense cluster of those particles toward the "center" of the universe, it wouldn't change the laws of physics, it would just give that part of the universe more gravity.

Answer 8

Read these links,maybe thay can help you.