911 was an inside we all know, but I do confince family members.?

Question

I strongly believe 911 was planned by people in own goverment but when I talk to family and friends about it they think I'm nuts. How do you go abouts convincing family and friends that 911 was an inside job?

Answer 1

Start slow,have them watch 9/11 revisited or 9/11 mysteries,then hit em with Alex Jones.Most people dont want to know or dont care,so dont expect them to.....Good Luck.......

Five Reasons To Deny 911 Was An Inside Job

By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
2-25-7
http://www.rense.com/general75/five.htm

1.Comfort.
Comfortable people do not dissent. They rarely question authority, unless overwhelmed by fleeting pangs of conscience or momentary madness. Why would any self-satisfied comfortable person want to discomfort themselves? The whole purpose of a comfortable person is to acquire more comfort or to ensure a perpetual state of comfort. Why would comfortable people, contented with their place in the world--
a comfortable home, a well-paid job, respect within their community--
want to upset that equilibrium? Why would any comfortable person question his government about circumstances he cannot control? Why risk discomfort, disapproval, suspension from work and community scorn simply to question something like 911 that cannot be changed? To a comfortable person, that makes no sense at all.
2. Complacency.
Complacent people rarely make waves, create dissension, cause an uproar. They prefer not to talk about politics and religion, nor to do any independent thinking. Because a complacent mind is a safe mind. Complacent people prefer "to get along to go along," to swim with the tide, to run with the herd, to blow with the wind. They like to mind their own business which, on the face of it, seems like common sense and the safe thing to do. Because to get passionately involved in any cause or belief
(aside from sports)
would require a lapse of complacency. Complacency, unlike comfort, requires a more practiced inertia. To accept the state or the status quo, with mild complaint--
but only the mildest, acceptable complaint--and plod along like herd animals. To dare question the state, or debate popular consensus, is not only foolish and insane but borderline treasonable to the complacent citizen.
3. Cowardice
Cowardice is the most understandable of denials of 911. It is convenient to deny 911 out of fear, because to do otherwise, to look at the evidence presented by the most powerful empire in the world, requires a heretical leap of independent thought. A mental insurrection worthy of revolutionaries, pioneers, patriots and outraged citizens. But cowards cannot sift the evidence and arrive at an independent conclusion. They have been beaten and cowed and, at most, can only cringe and howl in derision from the rear. At every original thought or contrary opinion
(contrary to the state and the corporate media that is),
they howl and scurry away, anonymously. At best, their children may lead them, by example, into a braver realm of thought.
4. Conviction
Conviction--to be convinced of one's rightness---
and the courage to assert it, is admirable even if one is proven wrong eventually. A great many believers
(in the official story)
are as convinced of the Kean Commission version of 911, as we skeptics are of their error. These believers claim, with many, many intelligent professionals to back up their claims, that steel does weaken and melt from fuel fires and big buildings do indeed collapse, that falling concrete does indeed pulverize into micro-sized dust particles, that incompetence does not necessary indicate evil.
We truthers, in turn, claim the mass of incriminating evidence overwhelms the experts and trumps their testimony. So who is more right? Time will tell. But the only way we will ever convince these true believers
(our co-workers, friends and family)
of the falsity in the official, government version of 911 is to show them what a lying, poisonous, murderous, mercenary, fear-mongering, war-mongering, fascistic group they have put their faith in. And every day more and more disgruntled citizens are becoming convinced we may have a point.
5. Collusion
A secret activity undertaken by two or more people for the purpose of FRAUD.
The definition of collusion. The US media colludes every day. They collude with the White House or Pentagon or State Department to perpetrate some fraud or other. And many of us collude right along with them. The smallest group of 911 deniers, numbering several million, which I call the Colluders, includes many who have worked for the US government, still work for the US government, receive huge chunks of money from that government to fund their work, depend on contracts from the US government and, more often than not, support the official US government line. Many of them, working high in the US government--NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon officials---
know exactly what happened on 911 but keep quiet. Colluding all the way to the bank. Privately they may not agree with many aspects of the official version but, publicly, they will NOT utter a single statement, will NOT go on record, publicly, with a single dissenting word. Not while there is money to be made. And so, of all the 911 deniers, they are most complicit with the crime.
Comfort. Complacency. Cowardice. Conviction. Collusion. And sometimes a combination of all of them.
Footnote: A tip of the cap to those activists at 911Blogger.com Not only do I read the columns posted there but the remarks (an addiction) and sneers from the trolls. This column is dedicated to the 911 activists everywhere, in recognition of the five types of people you run up against every day--and I mean against.

Answer 2

Maybe on account that they already accomplished a multimillion buck research and located NOTHING to denote that the Bush Administration was once in the back of this. Honestly... any individual who has EVER visible a submit of mine in this website is aware of that I am no fan of G.W. Bush. BUT... and this can be a BIG BUT.... I do not feel he's wholly bat-SHlT insane both. The govt are not able to pull off a information convention with out a few mistake.... it is wholly RIDICULOUS to feel that they perfectly carried out the demolition of 2 skyscrapers in minimize Manhattan..... killed over 3000 persons.... and NOT ONE.... NOT A SINGLE PERSON had any regret, judgment of right and wrong, or made even probably the most MINUTE mistake of their process. The proposal that persons stressed 2 one hundred ten tale constructions for demolition among 7 p.m. Sept. 10 and five a.m. September eleven..... good if you happen to think that I've bought a few ocean-entrance estate in Iowa to promote you. While we're at the field..... an unbiased fee to verify the supply of all the ones Sasquatch reviews could be a lot more valuable and extra justified.

Answer 3

The first thing you want to do is back your beliefs up with some education.
I would suggest looking into the lies, distortions and omissions that surrounded the official story. There is irrefutable evidence proving the official story is erroneous.

Spend some time reading and researching both sides of this debate. There is a lot of misinformation out there so you are best to check your sources and ignore name calling and people who's arguments are tenuous.

I will drop a few links but please look into this yourself and don't believe any one person. I am with you that it was an indise job and I have read more and looked at more than most people who have claimed it was debunked will ever come close to looking at.

Answer 4

Did you watch the thing on 9/11 on the History Channel. That has all of the facts, not the opinions.

Answer 5

If they don't believe the bombs brought down the towers, show the this little clip.This is what the government controlled networks don't want us to remember:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-972875032828177268&q=Proof+that+bombs&total=569&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Answer 6

forget them...they can believe what they want...but 9/11 was an inside job

Answer 7

First, no we don't all know.
Since you say you strongly believe, your also saying that you don't know for sure. Otherwise you would say I know for a fact.

If that's what you meant to say, well then show me your facts.

Every fact shows that it was a terrorist attack, not a inside job.

You guys keep saying our president and his government are morons, but somehow they are genius enough to pull this off?
Seriously your contradicting your own statements people.

Answer 8

People are generally convinced of events when they are presented with valid and verifiable facts.
What you "strongly believe" qualifies as neither valid nor verifiable.

Answer 9

First, you should show them all the credible evidence proving your conspiracy theory. Oh wait, that's right... there isn't any.

OK... just provide the logical explanation on how the thousands of people involved kept quiet... er wait, there's no answer to that either.

Well... Looks like you're just going to have to stick with being nuts.

Answer 10

Dude.. You should listen to your family. Your family is right. 9/11 was not an inside job. Media Jihadists started this rumor.