English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This man is making millions off of stories that he himself is concocting about global warming which has never been scientifically proved to even exist and even if it does we have had 7 different ices ages and 7 warm up periods. Man was not even around when these climate changes ocurred. When i see the concerts being put on by this Flim Flam man i cant help but think of the moonies and Rev. Moon and i hope it doesnt end up like Jonestown.

2007-07-08 14:54:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

13 answers

It is a hotly debated subject. The movie actually put me to sleep; however, some of my friends really liked it.
~

2007-07-08 15:11:51 · answer #1 · answered by . 6 · 0 1

He's a politician, and there are so many liars to choose from its hard to say who is the worst. He's using this cause to further his career and make money, and nothing more. Sure, the global warming alarmists have their own facts, but look at how much of the data that is being touted by the so called scientists is not from testing conducted using the scientific method. Real scientists encourage debate, they don't try to shut it down. We are still debating quantum mechanics, and that's been around for over 50 years.

I won't put up the argument that the earth hasn't warmed a degree or so in a hundred years. It probably has. But how much is really caused specifically by human activity? There have been natural warming and cooling periods constantly on earth that were proven to have nothing to do with humans (humans weren't even in existence for most of them). And if it can be proven that humans have caused A PORTION of the warming, what can realistically be done to minimize the effect. And what effect will those decisions have on our lives. If all of humanity went back to pre-industrial revolution and used no electricity whatsoever, that might do it. Do we really want to go there? My driving a Prius is not alone going to eliminate global warming. Let's be smart about this.

Remember, in the 70's a number of "scientists" were raising the alarm about global cooling! As long as we can keep the politicians from doing something stupid in the short term, its not like the planet will become uninhabitable for a few years. China certainly doesn't care about global warming and they have become a bigger contributer to greenhouse gases than we are.

2007-07-08 15:06:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well, how can anybody take this moron seriously? This is the same guy who lied about his invention of the INTERNET. This is the same guy who lied about how Bill Clinton was innocent of perjury and innocent of having sex with an intern. He also continues to lie about having been elected in 2000, even after a 100% total recount of ALL of the ballots in Florida by numerous newspapers including the Washington Post and the Miami Herald concluded that Bush won the election. The man has absolutely no creditability whatsoever, especially if you dig into the lies at the base of global warming.

One of the first things that Clinton did was have his newly appointed director of the NSF(Natl Sci Foun) direct that no further money will be directed to any scientists who disagree with global warming. So billions of US taxpayer money has been sent to scientists who will agree that global warming exists and billions of dollars more are promised, but only to those that accept Al Gore's theory that global warming is a fact.

One of the biggest pieces of evidence that Al Gore pretends proves his theorem of Global Warming is the Columbia Icefield in Canada and the Athabasca glacier in particular. So called climatologists claim that the glacier is receding to a point where some day it will totally disappear and that would be a disaster for the earth, EXCEPT for the fact, that the glacier in question has already receded to a point of complete disappearance before and has rebounded.

Al Gore and his environmental wacko scientists don't KNOW
that we are in global warming, compared to being in a global warming PERIOD. Al Gore and his friends don't KNOW what is going to happen tomorrow, 10 years from now, 50 years from now, they are only giving their forecasts, predictions, or WAG(wild-*** guess) to what MIGHT happen.

Al GORE and his friends also tell you that Global warming WILL be disastrous for the planet and for all the people and animals on the planet, yet they can't and don't KNOW that as a scientific fact. Why? Because real scientists collect and analyze data, they don't categorize things as bad or good.

While global warming and ocean sea-levels rising may be bad for some people like the hollywood elites living on Malibu beach, it may be just as beneficial to people living in Siberia, Canada, Iceland, Scandanavia, or England.

Global warming, despite the lies of the old media and the environmental fascists is NOT a scientific fact, it is a theory. The WAG's of Al Gore are NOT scientific facts, they are only a GUESS as to what MIGHT happen.

whale

2007-07-08 19:16:59 · answer #3 · answered by WilliamH10 6 · 1 0

A Flim Flam Artist is a person who consciously deceives others. I am not a fan of Al Gore, but I don't believe he deliberately is deceiving people. He believes what he says. I believe global warming is a reality, I grew up in a country in Europe, that had frost by September and winter lasted till March. It has definitely changed, there is hardly any snow now, and heat has become a problem. I don't remember anyone ever needed air conditioning there. They do now, the heat is stifling. I was lucky when it reached 20 degrees Celsius in the Summer. Now they have 30 degrees in the Summer. Don't tell me there is no global warming happening. I know it is.

2007-07-08 15:44:03 · answer #4 · answered by flieder77 4 · 0 1

collectively as what you're saying is easily genuine, there'll continuously be flim-flam adult males interior the international. The incredibly unhappy situation is the perversion of a as quickly as large humanitarian award. The Nobel prize committee has become a very time table-pushed team of Leftists and could pay no interest to the standards set down with the help of Alfred Nobel whilst he generic the award. They as much as admitted that the sole reason they gave Jimmy Carter the award some years in the past became to insult George W. Bush! on the grounds that whilst is that a NOBEL reason to grant an award???

2016-09-29 08:21:43 · answer #5 · answered by savitz 4 · 0 0

Scientists have acknowleged that there is rapid climate change which is not consistent with the other types of shifts in the weather we have had in the past.

They have been monitoring the melting of the glaciers and the rate they have been melting has significantly SIGNIFICANTLY increased over the last 3 - 4 decades.

I would agree with you on Al Gore if he hadn't been talking about this subject for over well over 10 years. The global climate and interest in the envirnoment has been his passion long before it was trendy.

I really can't understand some people's lack of awareness and how they can continue to refute scientific proof and factual explanations why we need to be more mindful and less wasteful of our natural resources. Is it because the Right hates anything that is backed by someone on the Left? How childish is that? Take some responsibility and stop looking at people who are trying to accomplish something positive on a global scale as suspect.

Is it that freakin' difficult to be more eco friendly?

2007-07-08 15:09:02 · answer #6 · answered by anonevyl 4 · 2 3

Maybe Global Warming is Frying Your Brain that would explain a lot - - - - pass the cool aid but unless there is a Gore Cullt a 'Jonestown' is unlikely. Gore has at best a hundred true followers - - - nuff said just getting this numb feeling out of my head after reading or attempting to read your rant - - - -

Pax------------------------------------------------

2007-07-08 15:16:16 · answer #7 · answered by JVHawai'i 7 · 0 1

no he's just another ignorant clueless clown that got barely passing grades in divinity school that the billionaire elite like george soros are using to get their propaganda out. quite similar to that fat dumb laid of auto worker michel moore who will take their temporary fame any way they can get it. of course no one is supposed to check any of their "facts" because they actually have none except hollywood style fiction. BTW mars , Jupiter,Pluto & the moon titan are also experincing global warming at this time. what does earth have in common with them. must just be coincidence that we all orbit the same sun

2007-07-08 15:17:29 · answer #8 · answered by Who Dat ? 7 · 1 1

Between Gore and Bush, Bush takes the prize.

Whether or not global warming is a reality, the downside of being ecologically conscious is minimal. Does is really hurt you to try and conserve the earths resources? Is it that big a deal to make the world a nicer place to live?

Meanwhile Bush was able to convince millions of breathtakingly stupid people to vote for him not once, but twice, when it was glowingly evident he was not only thoroughly incompetent, but likely to cause great damage to the country and world.

So whereas Gore offends a lot of reactionary mindless cretins Bush appeals to them. I'd say that if riding on the shoulders of the nadir of human culture makes someone a flim flam artist, then Bush is the Da Vinci of our time, and the people who elected him are the real cult fanatics.

2007-07-08 15:02:38 · answer #9 · answered by babyeightyone 2 · 4 5

You answered your own question. He isn't yet by title. Although look back to the pseudo-science of Eugenics to understand what we are basically living. Thankfully we aren't killing or sterilizing people with this one. I'm all for cleaning up the planet and taking care of it BUT don't make up crap. Just admit we need to clean up the planet.

2007-07-08 15:01:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers