Sooo....If O.J. didn't do it.............?

Question

then who did?? I was born in 1991, so i was not old enough to know what was going on. But I have recently read about it and when they found him not guilty, why did they just stop trying to find who did it then (even though in MY personal opinion, he DID do it). If they honestly believed he was innocent, why not try to bring the death of Nicole and Ronald to justice??

Answer 1

Reasonable Doubt. I watched everything from, the White Bronco slow pursuit to the jury verdict. The turning point was Mark Furman being painted as a racist, and the argument that there was an anti-coagulant found in the blood in the Bronco. They presented that as proof that the blood was planted, but there is a certain quantity of that chemical in everyone's blood, but it was presented well enough by Johnny Cochran to cause "Reasonable Doubt" in the jury. But trust me..he did it. He murdered them both

Answer 2

When you say "they" believed he was innocent, who are you talking about? The cops believed he was guilty, the DAs believed he was guilty, and the victims' families believed he was guilty.

So, they would not spend any energy continuing to look for someone else that "they" did not believe even existed.

The jury found OJ "not guilty" (not the same as innocent). They did their job in our system. After that, they did not have an obligation to go out and find out who actually committed the crime. In fact, many may have believed that OJ did it, but found him not guilty because they had too many questions about how the case was handled by the police and DA. This gave them "reasonable doubt" and so OJ walked free.

In short, the only one who has publicly stated that he would continue the search for the "real killers" is OJ himself. But instead, he moved to Florida where he plays golf and enjoys his NFL retirement. Why do you think he isn't looking?

Answer 3

OJ committed the crime. But the incompentant LA police department in the zeal to convict without an investigation did so many improper things that jury could not be sure that he ws guilty because of the gross misconduct of the police and district attorney.

Answer 4

His book is now the property of Ron Goldman's family. It has been retitled "Confessions of a Double Murderer"

AMZN is trading at $69 with a P/E of 116. Even with those sorry a** numbers they may see an uptick when the book goes on sale.

OOOPPPS: He did it. He was not found innocent. He was found "Not Guilty" meaning the prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt. My favorite juror was the one that posed for Playboy. 12 of our finest!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PS The search continues on every golf course the jerk plays.

Answer 5

O.J did kill his ex wife and Ron Goldman the reason O.J got by with murder is he had enough attorneys, and his attorneys played the race card. O.J putting those leather gloves on, and everyone knows when leather gets wet they shrik a little. O.J tells in his book how he would have killed them if he had....."The man is as guilty as sin."

Answer 6

O.J. probably did do it, but because we have a corrupt justice system where money can buy freedom (and because of double jeopardy) he will live free for the rest of his life.

Answer 7

The glove didn't fit but he still did it. Everyone knows he did it. He was found guilty in the civil trial, just not the one that mattered

Answer 8

He admitted to the crime in a book. He had her blood in his Bronco, he had her blood on his bedroom carpet. The police dropped the case because he got away with murder.

Answer 9

only the jury thought he was innocent

Answer 10

if OJ didn't do it, it didn't happen. it happened. rest in peace nicole and ron.