Not to defend him or anything, but he was just an actor who was given the role of the idiot president while the globalists executed their false flag tactics. He most likely did not mastermind, bankroll, or really have anything to do with the execution, though he was definitely a huge part of the coverup.
2007-07-08 13:44:50 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Read the question again. I said he was NOT the planner of the attacks.
2007-07-08 14:01:08 · update #1
Jake T - it is funny that you would use a boogey man metaphor, when the "boogey man" muslims are behind every corner, conspiring to attack you!
2007-07-08 14:03:09 · update #2
sgtMofo, its been done before, and you don't ever go look at them.
Here is a website that has better info than most other 9/11 truth website that suggest that the there was no plane that hit the pentagon, which is in my opinion a load of crap that the government is happy to have 9/11 truthers believing, because it makes them look bad. That is probably why they don't release the tapes that show the plane.
http://www.truthmove.org/
2007-07-08 14:06:14 · update #3
that makes him more guilty in my book
2007-07-08 13:47:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋
No. Keep the closet door closed at night and the boogy man can't hurt you.
Edit: I refuse to live in fear. People have been killing other people for an untold number of years for a wide spectrum of reasons. How is this any different? I and those in my family have a better chance of dieing from a lightningstike the from a terrorist attack. I can do little about either. Also the world has constantly been manipulated by those in power. I have only one life and I will live it the best I can they way I want in the environment I was born to. Does this make me a sheep? Perhaps, but I wont spend my time tacking tidbits of information true or not true together in the hopes that one day some day I will see the "truth".
2007-07-08 20:50:13 · answer #2 · answered by jake T 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Your question is based on the assumption that 9/11 was an inside job. I find this to be highly unlikely.
However, if that assumption is true, it would not make sense for President Bush to be solely responsible for the attacks. He really has very little to gain and a lot to lose if the truth came out. It would only be logical for others to be involved as well.
While I do not personally believe that 9/11 was an inside job, if it was others had to be involved and President Bush is likely a pawn rather than a mastermind.
2007-07-08 20:49:57 · answer #3 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Personally, I think it was a bunch of pissed off Islofascist bent on destroying western civilization who have a long history of previous terrorist attacks against America and even attacked the Twin Towers years before and shortly after 9/11 took credit for the attacks. But other than that, I don't really have anything with the credibility of "Loose Change" to fall back on. Guess I'm just a whacko conspiracy nut.
2007-07-08 21:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you get a life & a brain. no one but the exstreamist whom hate america, did this. It was not just Muslim persay , but exsream Muslims. What is so hard to get through your head that there are people out there that would kill you just for the sport. I am for killing them before they kill me.I was wounded at 18 fighting to give you the right to be a IDIOT. I was lucky . my wound only gave me a permenet limp & I continued in my military service. I also was in Gulf 1. i love this country & even to day as a broken down old man of 63 I will fight to the death to protect it. HOW ABOUT YOU//
2007-07-08 21:13:43 · answer #5 · answered by BUTCH 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I've seen the footage a few times, it looks like planes hit the buildings, causing them to collapse. I think its safe to say that had Bush been piloting the planes he would not have survived. The man is certainly no Grover Cleveland, but try to remember, 9/11 happened fairly early in his presidency, it would be difficult to pin the blame entirely on him.
2007-07-08 20:49:09 · answer #6 · answered by Will 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No actually, I don't. I think it was a collective effort among the tooth fairy, the Easter bunny, Santa Claus, and Harry Potter! The evidence is undeniable...check this site out www.realrealrealtruthabout911wepromiseitis.com (There is 100 percent chance this site is down)
2007-07-08 21:21:26 · answer #7 · answered by #1 Dunkin' Donuts Fan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would Bush be responsible for 9/11. No really, what evidence do you have, if anybody, the security guards are to blame, but why do you think Bush is responsible? You people make me sick.
Have fun with Juliani.
2007-07-08 20:57:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
From my point of view, NO. Why? Because one has to go back in history and find the root cause. Bush just acted out what he thought was best for his country. But as we all know, if we fight fire with fire, nothing good will come out of it.
2007-07-08 20:55:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. The man smart enough to do that was too dumb to plant WMDs. And now, you relegate him to puppet to cover that complaint! WOW!
You don't get all the national secrets made public, all the facts the government, while at war, is keeping, so IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!
What idiocy.
2007-07-08 20:49:01 · answer #10 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I absolutely love how people can call him the biggest idiot to ever inhabit the White House, and then in the same breath claim he managed to perpetrate what would be the biggest govt. cover-up in the history of the planet. It's been six freaking years people, give it a rest already.
2007-07-08 20:49:39 · answer #11 · answered by Dekardkain 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋