English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-08 12:51:15 · 5 answers · asked by sannaparis 2 in Arts & Humanities History

die - was a typo, meant did

2007-07-08 13:20:46 · update #1

5 answers

Before presenting a recent adaptation of D. H. Lawrence's "Sons and Lovers", the actresses were forbidden to remove any body hair in preparation for their parts, so English women (and quite likely American women as well) at the end of the Victorian era didn't shave either their underarms or legs.

The BBC notes that Wilkerson Sword launched a marketing campaign aimed at women in 1915, and within two years sales of razor blades doubled (quite possibly for shaving the underarms since summer frocks at this point became sleeveless for the first time).

"Flappers" wore comparatively short, leg-revealing dresses in both the United Kingdom and the United States during the 1920s, but no mention is made about whether they shaved their legs. Presumably by the 1940s, young British women, along with their American cousins, shaved their legs, so they would look like Betty Grable in their nylons.

2007-07-08 13:34:00 · answer #1 · answered by Ellie Evans-Thyme 7 · 1 0

Do women in the UK shave their legs ??? Or is that a fuzzy wuzzy wool sock yer wearing? Actually women have been shaving their legs for millenium Greek and Roman wmen used products much like 'Nair' and of course blades but quite often tweezers were used to pluck hair. Men like smooth legs inb bed. It is a guy thing. Women have traditionally done what Man wants. Oh certainly some women don't shave never have and never will but a majority of women tend to get rid of body hair - - - heck hard core L s ians do so!! So hemlines have nothing to do with removal of bodyhair aside from prompting more women to start shaving their legs pits privates - - - - -

Since the UK was once a Roman Outpost you can place the plucking and hot wax methods of shaving to around the time of Christ...

http://webhome.idirect.com/~brucer/RAZ_WOM.html
"""""""The history of shaving for women prior to the early decades of the twentieth century remains something of a mystery. Like their male counterparts, women have left few written records relating to the issue of hair removal, but unlike men, they have left no clear artifactual record either. To those few observers who have considered the subject, the general concensus is that shaving was simply not an issue for women before the crucial era when hemlines went up and sleeves came off. This is ceratinly a viable conclusion, and may well be correct, but there are two niggling flies in the ointment of this perception which suggest the question should remain open. The first of these is the simple logical observation that an absence of positive proof does not itself constitute negative proof. In other words, the fact that we can not prove women were shaving in earlier periods does not necessarily prove that they did not. Given the highly private and probably embarrassing nature of the subject, it is possible that women have been removing unwanted body hair for centuries 'in camera' so to speak.

This possibility is strengthened by a second consideration, drawn from the history of Western art. Since archaic times 'Woman' has been portrayed in painting and sculpture as being perfectly smooth from head to foot, excepting only the hair on her head and - in some eras - her pubic hair. This is obviously not an accurate reflection of reality, but an abstract ideal, no doubt primarily created by and for men. Nonetheless, it was (and is) an ideal deeply embedded in our cultural heritage, and as such represents a goal to be achieved. It seems likely that certain classes of women at least - hetairae, courtesans & prostitutes perhaps - would have taken steps to conform with this paradigm of female pulchritude. How did they do it? We simply do not yet know, and may never know. Nevertheless, the persistence of the ideal remains a powerful argument that some means were probably found in various times and places.
What is certain is that once the dictates of fashion began calling for bare arms and legs - essentially the decade of the 1920s - the shaving industry was quick to step into the breach. Gillette produced its first 'ladies' shaver in 1915, and specialized products for women have remained a distinctive element in the constellation of shaving products ever since.

The question here, of course, is why and how are these products different from their 'male' counterparts? A close analysis of numerous razor models has failed to identify any difference in the construction of the key functional element - the blades - between 'mens' and 'ladies' razors. On the other hand, there are major differences apparent in overall shape, colour, decoration and packaging between the two. In other words, there is substantial differentiation embodied in the discretionary design elements of these items, but none at all in the essential components. The nature and significance of these distinctions will be examined in more detail in the section on Gender & Shaving."""


Pax-----------------------------------

2007-07-08 23:09:29 · answer #2 · answered by JVHawai'i 7 · 0 0

When American soldiers came to defend England from war on the continent. Women in the US were showing more leg sooner than in England (vestiges of Victornism) and shaved legs looked (and felt) better than unshaved. When English girls were catching the eyes of American soldiers, that is when leg shaving began in earnest. One of the few good things to come from war, I suppose, at least from a man's point of view.

2007-07-08 20:02:19 · answer #3 · answered by Rabbit 7 · 1 0

When they stopped wearing long skirts. Once legs were exposed, the hairy look was reagrded as unfemenine. Not all women stopped wearing long dresses at once.

2007-07-08 20:39:59 · answer #4 · answered by Letizia 6 · 0 0

What do you mean by die?...or do you mean do? lol!...sorry but dont understand the question.

2007-07-08 20:01:10 · answer #5 · answered by cuteebony29 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers