2007-07-08 10:47:32 · 18 answers · asked by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wouldn't elect her to be the dog catcher. She is dishonest.
2007-07-08 10:51:53 · answer #1 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
It's highly doubtful that she's want to run for Mayor of our city. Chula Vista, California isn't exactly a major city, and being Mayor of Chula Vista isn't going to get her any national attention. I doubt that many outside the San Diego area even knows who the Mayor in this city is, or even who the Mayor of San Diego is. Even if she should decide to run, I wouldn't vote for her, besides the fact that she's an outsider, our views on the role of government are too far apart for me to ever want to elect her to any office.
2007-07-08 18:14:25 · answer #2 · answered by Mike W 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, she a goverment nannies will raise taxes on everything from gasoline to owning stock shares. Democrats I figure them out after the age of 25 and found out they are not helping the poor thier playing classwarfare, and race baiting to score votes because they have no core convictions in thier politcal views, and Hillary is carpetbagger if I ever saw one.
2007-07-08 17:57:44 · answer #3 · answered by ram456456 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
She is a media darling. She is not really a leader, but I don't think she could ever be the mayor of any city.
2007-07-08 17:52:02 · answer #4 · answered by Kenaldinho 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. I have heard her speeches, and she contradicts herself several times, saying things like a woman president would be better, and then a few days later saying that a woman president is better is sexism. I only ever see her say things that make the people she is around agree with her.
2007-07-08 17:50:43 · answer #5 · answered by rosslambert 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No. San Jose is considered to be the safest city in the nation. I want to keep it that way. Chuck Reed is doing a good job.
2007-07-08 17:51:57 · answer #6 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
no, this country does not want or need eight more years of a clinton legacy and the idea she didnt know is totally absurd.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-07-08 18:14:34 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, my city currently has no city income tax. That would change under Hillary, as she would have to "solve" all the problems my city doesn't have.
2007-07-08 17:51:27 · answer #8 · answered by RP McMurphy 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
bah, even if all the negative things people above are saying are true she'd be a breath of fresh air in this town. and we like women politicians around here. we've given congress two of the most ineffectual women in the government. and re-elected them several times.
2007-07-08 18:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
NOOO.. I wouldn't vote for her to be anything, let alone president.
Why not? she's corrupt, greedy, immoral and many other things.
What are people who vote for her thinking?
.
2007-07-08 17:58:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋