English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

for a clearly lost cause?

Or will they keep up the party Bu%%$&!t knowing full well that their war profiteering greed is destroying our troops physically and mentally?

Do they even care?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070708/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

.

2007-07-08 10:46:21 · 11 answers · asked by easy_game_101 2 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

I agree with you.

But they are Traditional means bunch of old dinosaurs, very hard to change and become modern??!!

I care very much, but the old Dino's!!!?????

Best Regards.

2007-07-08 11:35:58 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

After watching a show called Battlefield Breakdown where troops, senior military men, and government officials were speaking about the problems in Iraq, the attitude of the pentagon, the lack of training and equipment, being thrust into situations they were not trained to carry out and how things are stretched to the breaking point, I would say they don't care. The chaos provides them cover and time to accomplish getting the rights to Iraq's oil, after all that is the true objective. Nothing else makes sense for our staying in Iraq. A self-sustaining democracy? Don't make me laugh or puke whichever the case may be.

2007-07-08 11:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

On the contrary the article clearly states that the Iraqi gov. is working together against the terrorist.
Or are you giving Al Qaida citizenship status? lol

Prominent Shiite and Sunni politicians called on Iraqi civilians to take up arms to defend themselves after a weekend of violence that claimed more than 220 lives, including 60 who died Sunday in a surge of bombings and shootings around Baghdad.

The calls reflect growing frustration with the inability of Iraqi security forces to prevent extremist attacks.

Regardless of the precise figure, the attack was clearly among the deadliest in Iraq in months. It reinforced suspicions that al-Qaida extremists were moving north to less protected regions beyond the U.S. security crackdown in Baghdad and on the capital's northern doorstep.

2007-07-08 11:08:50 · answer #3 · answered by Miss Kitty 6 · 0 1

First the Iraq conflict isn't a conflict, as Vietnam and Korea weren't technically wars. we are struggling with and death yet no statement of conflict became issued with the help of the Congress. 2d, Bush did no longer declare the conflict became over, he declared that important wrestle operations have been over. He intently worded the word so this argument ought to no longer be used against him. additionally he posed with the project valuable banner at the back of him to make it look extra beneficial, nonetheless it became sparkling that we ought to be in Iraq for it sluggish. those days the Bush White homestead gave blame for the project performed banner to the Captain of the deliver and wiped their palms sparkling of it. All of that reported, I by no ability theory this became a stable theory and that i think of one hundred fifty,000 troops could nevertheless be seen important operations, yet it incredibly is in basic terms me. the priority in Iraq is going back 1000's of years and became made worse whilst the British in all of their understanding desperate to create the rustic with ridiculous limitations. we now have 3 factions that have been struggling with for years and with very stupid motives and no person government that we set up will win out. extra artwork desires to be accomplished to coach that the Iraqis are working independently from the U. S. command in Iraq and extra beneficial circumstances would desire to be attainable for every day existence. the U. S. could spend extra time and funds making particular the electric powered energy is on, persons are working and going to college and safeguard, then the rest will artwork itself out. stunning now too a lot of human beings have too a lot time and not adequate wish and this breeds hate and the struggling with.

2016-09-29 08:04:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The only people that dont care about our troops are liberals that have been advocating our defeat and demeaning the troops like Harry Reid and John Kerry.

2007-07-08 11:29:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Did you read your own article.

The first paragraph is this

"Prominent Shiite and Sunni politicians called on Iraqi civilians to take up arms to defend themselves after a weekend of violence that claimed more than 220 lives, including 60 who died Sunday in a surge of bombings and shootings around Baghdad"

Looks to me like the different branches of Islam are finally starting to fight together AGAINST the insurgents and Al queda.

Really, learn how to read your own articles

2007-07-08 10:50:32 · answer #6 · answered by Dina W 6 · 4 1

Clinton sent our troops to the following civil wars,
Haiti
Bosnia
Somalia
East Timor
Where were you complaints then?
Of course he didn't finish the job anywhere either.

2007-07-08 10:59:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

okay we can leave Iraq then what? do we let the Iraq security force defend themselves? or how bout we just hand iraq over to iran and turkey then leave? leaving now will only worsen your "civil war"

2007-07-08 11:02:45 · answer #8 · answered by Christopher D 1 · 1 1

The first question that Bush and Cheney asked, is how much do we get per US sodier's head.

2007-07-08 11:17:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not until Haliburton gets their quota or starts getting THEIR a*** killed which ever comes first.
Cheney in the mean time will still be hiding out.

2007-07-08 10:54:32 · answer #10 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers