English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does anyone find this rather unfair?

Situation:
My boss (a dentist) has two dental offices. A main one (7 operating rooms with 3 associate docs and 10 employees in staff) and a branch (4 rooms total with just the main doc and 4 employees in staff).

I work at the branch.

The doctor went on a full week vacation with his family.

The manager closed down the main office but made us, in the smaller office, come in all week.

The manager's logic is that we need to take incoming phone calls from patients.

But the MAIN office gets on average 20 new patients a week while we get around 4 new patients a week.

Since I'm moving in 6 weeks and trying to earn up every which way I can, I took it as a "earn wage without doing much work" type of week.

But of course there are the three others in the office that would have preferred a vacation and spending time with family.

What's your take? Should this have been reported somewhere?

2007-07-08 10:28:42 · 4 answers · asked by Janelle 'Nellie' 1 in Business & Finance Small Business

To add: This company won't have another official vacation break until end of December.

The small office would just be staffed without any patients coming in in the week. No doctor.

2007-07-08 10:33:51 · update #1

Both offices = same owner, owner is main doctor (works 3 days at main office, works 2 days at branch). Manager is also the same for both.

2007-07-08 11:13:20 · update #2

4 answers

Since you are moving in 6 weeks , i assume you will be changing jobs as well ?
It seems this was the standard at this job from the beginning so why complain now ?
Next job be sure to go over benifits , before you accept the job.

2007-07-08 10:42:04 · answer #1 · answered by bigfred1954 4 · 0 0

If it is clearly stated when company "holidays" are supposed to be, I dont think you can report anything.

Most likely you work in an "at will" state, which means the employer can close down anything he/she wants for any reason at any time. Same goes for hiring and firing.

I would imagine that the 2 "branches" are set up as 2 entirely separate entities with separate ownership of each, and that is why one closed down while the other didnt.

It may be unfair, but it isnt illegal.

2007-07-08 10:41:53 · answer #2 · answered by I Can Count To Potato 7 · 0 0

no longer each and every person could be a mechanical engineering pupil. What of those human beings? What jobs would be there for them? the only party that protects exertions and the working classification is the Democrats. The republicans have performed each and everything to outsource and offshore jobs to make the wealthy richer on the fee of the working guy. This country became built on the working classification.....people who're knowledgeable extra us no longer something yet ache in 2008.

2016-10-20 08:05:42 · answer #3 · answered by duffina 4 · 0 0

Fair, maybe not. Legal, yes - unless you have a written contract that you get paid vacation, there is no legal requirement for the employer to give it.

2007-07-08 10:40:03 · answer #4 · answered by Judy 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers