It's not that chocolates are a substitute for love.
Love is a substitute for chocolate. Chocolate is,
let's face it, far more reliable than a man.
2007-07-08 07:50:02 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
lol =D......
2007-07-08 07:50:21 · update #1
As a woman that has been married for 10 years I can without a doubt, completely and whole-heartedly agree with you!;) Now......where did I put that snickers?
2007-07-08 07:56:59 · answer #1 · answered by no longer here 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, but a man doesn't make you gain a bunch of weight, well unless he gets you pregnant, oh hell I'm for the chocolate!
2007-07-08 14:54:34 · answer #2 · answered by Beth 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've never been in love with a man, but I sure am in love with chocolate.
2007-07-08 14:53:19 · answer #3 · answered by blueruble 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
and chocolate would never avoid you in the morning when you have horrible dragon breath, lol
Even better is that chocolate never leaves dirty glasses on the coffee table, or socks in the living room
2007-07-08 14:58:01 · answer #4 · answered by spunion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I love chocolate.
2007-07-08 14:52:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless you set them in the hot sun and then you have a mess.One thing you can always count on them being there when you need something sweet.
2007-07-08 14:55:21 · answer #6 · answered by sharen d 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well if you think chocolate is more reliable, then
i highly recommend you stop smoking your socks.
socks are not a replacement for tobacco
2007-07-08 14:54:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not so sure abt that. I'd choose my husband over a hershey bar anyday!!
2007-07-08 14:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by Tikled_Ivory 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
same can be said of Ladies
2007-07-08 14:53:04 · answer #9 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yeah!
2007-07-08 14:54:28 · answer #10 · answered by nana_bad_ass 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋