English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

No, That's mean.

2007-07-08 07:45:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No!!! That wouldn't be right at all. They can't help it they have unattractive feet. How would u like it if you was prohibited from eating? Man.

2007-07-08 07:50:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no & xactly tell me what is the definition of unattractive feet?? just bcuz u dun like them doesnt mean they are unattractive. people shud b able to wear/do whatever they please. how would u like if i said nerds shud b prohibited (since ur name is Nerds Rule)??

2007-07-08 07:56:24 · answer #3 · answered by Angie: No end in sight 4 · 0 0

YES - there is no need to have unattractive feet in my books - no feet are great (apart from mine!) and all you need is a foot file and a bit of nail varnish (girls) and they look half decent.

2007-07-08 07:47:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Prohibited no, but they should have consideration for others and just not wear them if they have nasty feet. ;-)

2007-07-08 19:15:59 · answer #5 · answered by riodejaneirofun3 6 · 1 0

no, they should just be required to get a pedicure and they should only be able to wear certain shoes like peep toes that only show that little part

2007-07-08 07:48:24 · answer #6 · answered by mianjo413 5 · 0 1

Sure lets make all ugly people wear mask too... No.

2007-07-08 07:46:54 · answer #7 · answered by Michael N 6 · 1 0

No, their feet need to breathe too!

2007-07-08 07:49:08 · answer #8 · answered by Oh, it's like that? 7 · 0 0

No, cause it still gives me something to look at or talk about

2007-07-08 07:46:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

All feet are ugly.

2007-07-08 07:48:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers