No, That's mean.
2007-07-08 07:45:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No!!! That wouldn't be right at all. They can't help it they have unattractive feet. How would u like it if you was prohibited from eating? Man.
2007-07-08 07:50:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no & xactly tell me what is the definition of unattractive feet?? just bcuz u dun like them doesnt mean they are unattractive. people shud b able to wear/do whatever they please. how would u like if i said nerds shud b prohibited (since ur name is Nerds Rule)??
2007-07-08 07:56:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Angie: No end in sight 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES - there is no need to have unattractive feet in my books - no feet are great (apart from mine!) and all you need is a foot file and a bit of nail varnish (girls) and they look half decent.
2007-07-08 07:47:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Prohibited no, but they should have consideration for others and just not wear them if they have nasty feet. ;-)
2007-07-08 19:15:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by riodejaneirofun3 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, they should just be required to get a pedicure and they should only be able to wear certain shoes like peep toes that only show that little part
2007-07-08 07:48:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by mianjo413 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sure lets make all ugly people wear mask too... No.
2007-07-08 07:46:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Michael N 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, their feet need to breathe too!
2007-07-08 07:49:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Oh, it's like that? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, cause it still gives me something to look at or talk about
2007-07-08 07:46:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
All feet are ugly.
2007-07-08 07:48:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋