would you rather we concentrate on saving the earth or actually helping people now like the homeless/starving or laying of china so it can grow.
2007-07-08 07:14:31 · 7 answers · asked by R R 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
me from http://www.babesandbet.com
2007-07-08 07:14:52 · update #1
dude, didn't know you have a socialist heart. hehehe.
i am for saving humanity as well as saving the environment.
2007-07-08 07:25:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People who don't care about the Earth or the environment simply don't get it. Let's be sincere. The Earth does not need saving. Life will prevail long after mankind is extinct, and the Earth will prevail long after life is extinct.
When people say "save the environment" or "save the Earth" they really mean "save humanity."
2007-07-08 07:20:18 · answer #2 · answered by Ben 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say save the earth and save the environment, and I don't mean save humanity so ben_of_marlow is wrong on that.
2007-07-10 15:30:37 · answer #3 · answered by Jer-Dog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
save the earth
2007-07-08 07:18:22 · answer #4 · answered by isisthewolf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saving the environment will in turn save humanity.
not sure what you mean by 'laying of china'?...
2007-07-08 08:28:09 · answer #5 · answered by Frootbat31 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok so what the 1st individual suggested became genuine the earths temp circulate up and down truly we are on the better scale genuine now in spite of the undeniable fact that it is going to circulate circulate into opposite and in ALONGGGGGGG time we are able to acully circulate right into a ice age. that's what my bro suggested! was hoping that helped
2016-10-01 03:44:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hate to tell you this but neither can be saved as
TIME, will destroy all.
2007-07-08 16:39:27 · answer #7 · answered by RudiA 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋