The whole day was about conservation and global warming - yet on stages across the world power was being drained from the supply that Gore is concerned with. Just thought it was a little hypocritical.
2007-07-08 03:21:34 · 7 answers · asked by Ryan 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Other - Entertainment
That is the way celebrities think, "do as I say, not as I do." They want others to conserve so their way of life is preserved.
2007-07-08 03:24:52 · answer #1 · answered by kepjr100 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well yeahh it is hypocritical. they had a 26 (or something) hour long program, butt what they did do was on one stage the background was made from recycled oil drums and those lightbulbs that use less power. butt how many people do you think are trying too make a difference now? i mean, most poeple i think were just there for the music. i do hope that they succeded in getting the message through, but at the same time i dont think alot of people cared.
2007-07-08 03:32:20 · answer #2 · answered by Mrs Cullen :) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure about the power, but here are some waste numbers:
222,623.63 miles traveled between the artists, 31,500 tons of carbon emissions (74,500 tons with the TV audience), 1,025 tons of waste at the concert stadiums
2007-07-08 03:59:47 · answer #3 · answered by piratas18 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sure that Al Gore's private jet does not consume fuel. It is probably run on hot air.
2007-07-08 03:24:19 · answer #4 · answered by Clown Knows 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im sure its a lot..............Al Gore's intention is good but the LIve Earth worsen it......i hope the money that comes out of it will help africa..they didnt do anything to worsen the global warning but they suffer a lot...
2007-07-12 00:45:33 · answer #5 · answered by dezz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering the fuel it took to get everyone there...Live Earth is just another con. It sells albums.
2007-07-08 03:31:32 · answer #6 · answered by Fixguy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good point
2007-07-08 03:42:28 · answer #7 · answered by ~LOZ~ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋