to the question of premarital sex, when, where
to the question of children the answer is no!
2007-07-07 23:47:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anarchy99 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think premarital sex is definitely OK. Before you marry someone in my opinion, you need to get to know all sides of them, and having sex is a good way to find that out. Also, if you are in love with them, there is no reason why you should not have sex before marriage. But still, some people do feel strongly about sex before marriage. Everyone has their own opinions.
2007-07-08 06:40:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Corrida 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
What's marital got to do with it. Sex gives one hard intelligence on the person who your involved with. Many unspoken, subconscious attitudes are understood by having sex than by any other method. Sex is after all, communication. Understanding your next to be ex is what it's all about. Knowing in advance that somebody is not ever going to right for you, saves a lot of grief. Premarital sex, is inferring that a couple has already decided to tie the knot, and are awaiting the wedding. Having a baby before the wedding is stupid. The child will need to be legitimate, if at all possible, because in this day and age, they lie to you about such things not being taken into account. A kid needs everything in his/'her favor.
2007-07-08 06:49:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's okay as long as everyone involved respects each other and is honest about it. Sometimes I think it's important too. There are many things I've done sexually before marriage that I couldn't do married. These are things that are better done without emotional attachment such as threesomes and same sex encounters. It's good that I got to experience what I wanted to. I appreciate monogamy with my husband more for it. I also believe it is important for people to learn that sex, while it may incorporate love, is not love. There are so many ways to enjoy sex. Thinking that sex is all about love or sex is love destroys relationships and even lives.
As a woman, I have a lot more confidence and appreciation for myself since exploring my sexuality. There are too many sexual stigmas and prejudices out there about sex that are harmful to a person's self perception and sexuality is very much a part of the self despite the popular fight to deny it. It's good to explore and know oneself and one's relationship with the world. I think having sex both in and outside of the confines of marriage is part of living life to the fullest and part of the path to self actualization.
I'm not opposed to others having children outside of wedlock more than I am to others having children in general. These days when nearly most parents are going to divorce anyways, what does it matter if they start out that way? Socially even children who don't have two parents will be just like a lot of their friends. The idea that children need a nuclear family is unfounded, certainly not universal, and based on nothing more than certain cultural standards, but the great thing about culture is that it changes!
2007-07-08 06:44:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by qwertatious 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Be smart, premarital sex is a different story than having a baby outside of marriage. Your too young probably if you have to ask this question.
2007-07-08 06:41:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
via the BIBLE it is morally wrong. It's a SIN!
now a days, just about everyone or anyone is getting laid before marriage. Hardly anybody or anyone gets married as a virgin - pure. It's more hypocritical than not for a couple to get married after they engaged in premarital sex and wind up having a baby out of WEDLOCK. Then when they do get married, the bride ends up wearing white. That's in itself is misleading the LORD in HIS face, in HIS house, the church. But once all is said and done, it's how you finish the deed that's important and that's doing it the right way in church and asking for forgiveness.
2007-07-08 06:47:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by nodiggity_1357 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
There's nothing wrong with sex between two consenting adults. Why should marriage make a difference? Either sex is good or it isn't, would you marry someone who didn't or couldn't satisfy you? Best to know before a marriage than after.
2007-07-09 05:39:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by duaneb_59 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it's intelligent to have premarital sex and to have a baby before marriage. Premarital sex doesn't have as much committments and responsibilities as when you're married. That can be disadvantageous to the woman and to the conceived child. The child would be illigitimate and can have problems linked to being illigitimate.
2007-07-08 07:11:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by wind m 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Premarital sex before marriage, yes if your intention is marriage and you are engaged but A BIG no - no on having kids out of wedlock
2007-07-08 07:42:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i know many people who have been together with children for years without being married, and it suits them fine. Marriage is unnecessary and is actually more trouble should you decide to break up. If i had to do it over again i wouldn't get married. it was $25 to marry and a divorce will cost me at LEAST $500.
if you have a child and break up, you can still get support, visitation, agreements, whatever.
i don't think that anyone under 16 should be having sex though.
2007-07-08 08:45:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Arraya 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I am a Christian, and I waited until my wedding night, and it was completely worth it. Because I waited, I have never had my heart broken, I've never had a pregnancy scare, and I've never had to worry about STD's. Even if you aren't a Christian, waiting until marriage relieves a lot of worries and stresses that sex outside of marriage can bring you.
2007-07-09 08:13:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by ad5000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋