When Saddam was in power the Iraqi people had electricity, schools, hospitals, clean water, etc. Now they have none of these things. They fear for their lives 24/7. Bush is evil. I believe he is more evil than Saddam.
I read that when the statute of Saddam was toppled, not only was it done by our military, not the Iraqi people, but it was orchestrated for the media. The protesters were not allowed within camera range and they had trouble rounding up enough people to cheer to make it look good for the cameras.
They are going to come over here and bomb us for revenge, so even our own country will become more unsafe. God help us all, for we will all be punished for the misdeeds of Bush.
2007-07-07 23:16:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by arejokerswild 6
·
6⤊
1⤋
I opposed the war in Iraq; however, the world is better off without Saddam.
I do not think a comparison can even be made between President Bush and his Administration and Saddam Hussein.
Look, in my opinion, President Bush, et al., were wrong; however, they are not dominering tyrannts like Hussein was. They simply made mistakes. Period.
2007-07-08 07:06:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by James S 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Saddam was a threat to his people and the people around him. President Bush is a threat to his people and any other country in the world that doesn't agree with him. You tell me.
2007-07-08 06:46:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
bad question...of course bush is better than saddam...i was going to insert a sarcastic joke here, but now i'm having a rare moment of sanity...whether bush is 'better than saddam' is not the point, and is a ridiculously low bar to clear...saddam was an evil man...bush is merely an incompetent, unintelligent, mule-headed, and
dishonest elitist...
2007-07-08 06:06:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by spike missing debra m 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well, Bush is alive and Saddam is dead. What do you think?
2007-07-08 05:45:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think he is better than Saddam, but I don't think he is worse either. I mean, he doesn't do it to the women of his country, he has the decency to make his messes abroad. Not that that's saying much...
I mean, don't get me wrong, I don't like the guy... but he's not mass killing Americans, and we aren't in the same kind of immediate danger that Saddam put his people thru...
2007-07-08 05:46:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Willalee 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
and how many pelosi press releases have you read my liberal extremist acquaitance.
lets see....saddam was ethnicly cleansing kurds from the face of the earth and responsible for mass genocide in iraq.
clinton ignored al qaeda resulting in the uss cole, african embassy bombings and wtc one and two, bush defended this country depsite liberal villifying and it stopped.
clintons office antics...
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
are still affecting this country and bush stopped that...saddam, well hes dead and i dont think hes bothering anyone now.
\
nope....bush is better...total runaway. liberals...gotta love em(as if)
2007-07-08 06:46:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
of-course , Bush is better than Saddam!
he is more cynic , good liar , and he still staying the course.
2007-07-08 05:44:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by jesus ben allah 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's a toss up. Ok, I give... Who gets to be on the gwb 'watchlist' now?
2007-07-08 06:16:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ro40rd 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Personally i think they are both evil men that should never have been put in charge of anything more than wiping their own butts.
2007-07-08 05:47:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋