Is it a flip flop, when Bush is now regarded as a liberal, when only a few days go he was the messiah?

Question

messiah - One who is anticipated as, regarded as, or professes to be a savior or liberator.

Answer 1

It's a little more than a flip flop.It's their admission of the total collapse of the destructive ideology of neoconservatism.
Labeling him a liberal is the complete rejection of his failed policies even by the right.
It also shows they have no real ideological foundations.What's true this week,can be denied the next.Sad and no one can honestly take anything they say serious because of that.

Answer 2

I can only answer this question by assuming something has been happening in America to make Bush's image appear softer or more to the left? I'm unsure because I am in Australia and can't be googling all day to find out. I also assume (and hope) the word messiah is being used metaphorically.

Anyway perhaps Bush simply has the spin doctors out there to try and make him seem more sympathetic to social causes, instead of oil and money. After all doesn't he have only 18 months left in office before all the biographers will be clambouring to write about his tenure as President? Not much time to turn the image around.

What ever the spin I would be wary about believing anything which this man says.

Answer 3

I think the present government is fascist

let s think fairly
first,do we have the right to have nuclear weapons and others not ?you may say we are a democratic country but you must know that Ahamadi Nejad elected and choosed by the iranian people(NB we are not sure if the president Bush desereved to be a president or not ,do you remeber the votes of the last state)
second: we are a democratic country but we hit Japan with 2 nuclear bombs at the end of the war without the need to do this (Japan was going to surrender)and we donot know if any japanese generation in the future may take revenege or not.
third:we allow some other countries to have nuclear weapond and help them like INDIA and ISRAEL WHICH is dangerous on the world peace and flaming wars from time to time (it is a reason of the hatred of many nations to usa)
forth:we have a very bad foreign policy against many countries like Cuba,Venezuela,middle east,north korea.,do you think if we have a fair normal diplomatic relation with these countries including iran ,does anyone of the world would attack us ?look at Canada ,it has a good realtions with all nations ,there is no terrorrism against it
fifth:we always attack others which makes them going to the steps of revenge.so if we stop shaking Iran regime ,do you think iranians and they know well that we are the strong power ,may attack us??

sixth: dealing with the iraq was is the worst .prisons of Abou ghareb ,killing citizens ,and many things which make others plans for revenge.

at the time of the second world war ,all countries of world and nations was looking up to USA ,now with the wrong decisions ,supporting some dictators,bad forign relations with many countries .the situation is difficult and there must be a change in the US policy

Answer 4

Are you on drugs? Bush is further right than any other person in history short of Rev Phelps and that is even questionable. Just because you have finally figured out that Bush is an idiot and the worse thing that ever happened to this country does not mean that you can now name him a
"Liberal"

Perhaps you need to read the definition and note NOTHING in it applies to Bush!

http://www.bartleby.com/61/87/L0148700.html

Answer 5

...who called him a messiah and what is he the messiah of exactly? who ever said that obviously didn't know what they were talking about. Bush hasn't liberated anyone. no, not even Iraq. he just made more problems.

Answer 6

i actually used to like clinton, until he turned out to be just common trailer trash from arkansas...

i never liked bush, i actually liked mccain... but... now maccain, like bush, is just another globalist... which is not far removed from a socialist... which is not far removed from a libby

admiring a political candidate and hoping that he can do some good things for the people while he is in power, is NOT the same as TRUSTING and having real HOPE in mankind's Only Savior, Jesus Christ

Answer 7

fantasy

I always from day one called him the lesser of two evils and always expected his first order of business to be to close the border.

He's a pseudo-Clinton

He hangs out with the Clintons.

The Bush and Clinton families are close friends.

Bush is for open borders,something that EVERY liberal supports wholeheartedly.

Infact I would say that I called him very early on for being a liberal and that since then the liberals have had to play like they hate him him because we were onto him.He's doing what THEY want,not what conservatives wanted him to do.

I would even call him a liberal messiah.

So when this liberal is out of office the liberals will simply get their next liberal into office.That's how this game works.

With jumping beans and open borders for all.

And no constitutional rights for anyone.

Answer 8

How do you even go about comparing a political position with God?

Anyway, Bush is NOT a liberal; in fact, he's more conservative than many conservatives. Believe me, liberals don't want him on our side.

Answer 9

The Messiah is a Liberal.

Who else would advocate "Be a fisher of men, not of fish"?

However, the Cons are showing their true colors by scuttling their fearless leader; the same man they would stand by, and chastise others as being unpatriotic for not supporting.

Cons flip flop more than Rush Limbaugh running a marathon...

Answer 10

i agree with rider m...we don't need him-y'all picked him as your prize pig at the county fair, now y'all gotta keep kissin' him...and while you're at it, make sure y'all got coulter tied up securely...it's got a nasty habit of wandering off and tearing up the garden...