my son was circumcised 2 years ago but he has a problem with his penis. after he was circumcised there was a skin ( i dont know if it is really a skin with ??) connecting the middle front of the head near the hole? to the body...
2007-07-07 20:05:39 · 9 answers · asked by anonymous_plankton 1 in Health ➔ Men's Health
Is it on the bottom side of the head? If so, that's the frenulum. Almost all uncircumcised guys have it (it prevents the foreskin from sliding too far back, just as the frenulum under the lips and tongue do) but some doctors leave it there after circumcision. It's supposed to add sensation.
Other than that, you don't mention if he has a problem with it. The only other things I can imagine are a skin bridge or meatal stenosis, two of the risks run into with circumcision. If you suspect that, you'd have to have him checked out. Otherwise, if it's the above, it's normal.
http://forums.govteen.com/showpost.php?p=3069995&postcount=2
2007-07-08 01:22:44 · answer #1 · answered by Jorge 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I will supply you my pleasant recommendation in this. I used to be circumcised at start, nonetheless I am restoring my foreskin. There are 20,000 nerve endings within the foreskin. They are specialised best contact nerve endings, they get stumulated and acquire pride another way than another aspect of your penis. If you get circumcised you're going to lose that endlessly. The aspect that may be restored with foreskin recovery is simply the dermis (extension of shaft dermis that's grown over the years) and the top of your penis is remained blanketed. When the top is exposed and rubbing in opposition to apparel is turns into much less and not more touchy over the years. And the sensitivity los on no account particularly quits. Guys who've been circumcised for fifty years have extra senation loss than any person who has been circumcised for 10. The extra it rubbs the fewer touchy it will get. Because my head is now blanketed 24/7 like your is, my historic dried caloused dermis that used to be inflicting my sensitivity loss is long gone, and I have semi-wet gentle touchy dermis again on my head. I can inform you that proper now I have spotted an overly massive broaden in sensitivity. I could say from the change I have felt that circumcision reduces sensitivity by way of approximately forty%. Maybe no longer part however very very near. Now with my raises sensitivity I have longer orgasms and extra strong orgasms and I revel in intercourse plenty extra. I truthfully think that if you do not desire a circumcision do not allow any person speak you into it. If it isn't whatever you desire you're going to commonly remorse it for the relaxation of your existence. Also circumcised penises are not purifier or more healthy, the ones are all myths. You will have to perform a little study and you're going to discover that your loved ones is aiding all of the historic myths which have been disproven. There is not any change among an uncircumcised and circumcised penis. You are proper, it will quite simply be constant with a frenuplasty. You don't want a entire circumcision. I could simply cross with that, do not get talked right into a circumcision. I can inform you that, that sensitivity loss is not valued at the bigger or more healthy existence they're tlaking approximately. That more healthy and purifier existence is a delusion and does not exist. Plus are you speakme to individuals who've felt the change? How do they realize? I could do what YOU desire. Don't do what different individuals desire. If you do not desire a massive loss in sensitivity then do not cross a head with it. Make your possess alternative, do not ever consider you must please your loved ones. This is your alternative in your possess frame and so they have got to recognize what ever your alternative is. -Connor
2016-09-05 19:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you describe could be one of two things. If it's located on the bottom of his penis then it could be the frenulum (link 1). If it's the remains of his frenulum he's fairly fortunate, as this is a very sensitive part of the body that's often removed in many circumcisions.
If it doesn't look like it's the frenulum then it's probably a skin bridge, an uncommon complication of infant or child circumcisions (links 2, 3 - warning, graphic pics). Note that link 2 says skin bridges are "extremely rare" but that's a lie, as skin bridges are one of the most common complications of circumcision after excessive bleeding and infection.
If it is a skin bridge, take your son to the doctor as soon as possible to get it corrected; very minor surgery is probably required. Sometimes skin bridges can make the skin on the penis tight and can cause painful erections later in life. Plus it tends to be rather unsightly.
2007-07-08 09:04:17 · answer #3 · answered by trebla_5 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It sounds like his frenulum wasn't removed during his circumcision. It's a small piece of skin that is designed to keep the foreskin in place sometimes it is totally removed as part of the circumcision but sometimes it is left. Either way it doesn't usually present a problem but if it is you should get it checked out. If he need to have it removed it is a very minor procedure and can usually be carried out in the doctors room with a local anaesthetic.
As always - if in doubt - seek the advice of a professional.
2007-07-08 01:41:53 · answer #4 · answered by istaffa 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As many people have mentioned, if it is underneath, it is the frenulum. There is no reason to remove it, just like there was no reason to remove your son's foreskin either, but that didn't stop you. Or maybe you were fooled into thinking that this is normal. It's not, it's mutilation. If it is anywhere else on the head of his penis, it's called an adhesion. It's the result of the mucus membrane (yes the head is a mucus membrane like the inside of your mouth) that healed to what was left of the foreskin. This was caused by not taking care of the skin after it was cut. Such as not pulling it back to clean it. If people learned simple hygiene, than circumcision would be obliterated. But we don't offer parenting classes either. At least you are trying to learn about the situation. Good luck
2007-07-08 05:17:51 · answer #5 · answered by The Wonder of It all 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Maybe you should have thought about the problems you would have had by having yours sons penis butchered without his OK. There is no reason to remove a perfectly good piece of his genitals.
What next remove his appendix in case he has a problem one day? Maybe take his tonsils out in case he gets and infections with them.
Did you get your daughters vaginal lips removed when she was a baby to make them look better? sure it will make sex worse for her when she gets older but so does removing your sons foreskin.
Maybe you should also get him to dye his hair so he looks the same as everybody else?
80% of the worlds men are still natural/normal/uncircumsised and nearly all have no problem with it unlike cut men who do have problems like lack of sensitivity, large scar on their penis and not to mention all the ones who have infections/problems from the operation itself.
2007-07-07 23:47:35 · answer #6 · answered by darth72au 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I believe that's normal. Hard to say without an actual photo, but I think that's normal. If you are concerned....you should go to the doctor and have it checked out.
2007-07-07 20:09:28 · answer #7 · answered by SlamDUNK 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Time for you to have him examined by your doctor who is qualified, trained, and kicensed to give medical advice. People on this site are not.
Chow!!
2007-07-08 01:24:42 · answer #8 · answered by No one 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it's normal i have it
2007-07-07 20:37:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋