If we hand over the oil rich country of Iraq to the insurgents,?

Question

(insurgents, the ones who strap bombs to themselves, and children) do you think they would, or would not, use the government funds to sponsor attacks throughout the world?


And if they did use those funds for attacks, isn't that a direct danger to our nations security?

Is it really that hard to understand?

----

leaving the country before the government can defend itself, is the same thing as handing over directly to the insurgents. (but I guess you are incapable of using the logic of a two year old)

---

removing saddam from power, and the current war, are two seperate issues, even though liberals love to cloud them together in attempt at diluting arguments.

Answer 1

Some notes for you.

(1) Stop watching Fox News and regurgitating worthless propoganda
(2) Restart your medication
(3) The insurgents are not going to be taking control of Iraq if and when we leave there. Either the Iraqi Sunnis or Iraqi Shiites will gain control after a bloody and probably lengthy civil war. If we stay there 100 years, they will start that war as soon as we leave. The insurgents are there because we are there.
(4) Congratulations on admitting your fondness of oil. This is in keeping with George and the man who is so completely characterized by his first name, Dick. My only question is would you lie and hand-pick intelligence to lead our nation into war and cause the death and dismemberment of thousands of our most committed and faithful Americans?
(5) If you spent more time investing in, researching and buying into alternative energy sources, YOU and the rest of this country would take away our dependence on foreign oil and our continued and despised involvement in the Middle East.
(6) Please, please, please. Stop. The only thing difficult to understand is the ease in which people can be propogandized in this country.

Answer 2

No that is not hard to understand. What is hard to understand is why the U.S .under Bush created the conditions in Iraq, as they exist today. They provided a training ground for urban Guerrilla warfare tactics to a generation of Islamic Guerrillas. That were successful in fighting the Israeli's to a standstill and will force America out of Iraq without a military victory. America has not won a victory in Korea, Vietnam. and after a brilliant "Shock and Awe" campaign ,will again be denied victory in Iraq. Mission Accomplished has only created the losing of America's credibility in the world and has shown the world America's weakness.

Answer 3

You are probably far from being able to admit it, but it may well turn out that we have turned Iraq over to the insurgents by going in.

Saddamn was a secular dictator, Iraq is now a Muslim theocracy. We did that.

Saddamn was a brutal despot who kept jihadis out of his country by brutal means because he knew they wished him no good. Now Iraq is awash in jihadis from all over the world. We did that.

Saddamn kept the Islamist regime in Iran at arm's length, even went to war to try to stamp it out. Now Iran has more influence in Iraq than ever. We allowed that to happen.

I keep misspelling Saddamn's name
on purpose, by the way, the bastard. That doesn't let Bush off the hook for what he's done.

Answer 4

Those insurgents are so disorganized, and the Bush pillaging was so thorough, that it will be years before the Iraqis have infrastructure or oil revenues. They don't have qualified personnel because of the mass exodus from Iraq. They don't have markets or crops. Bush may think he is in control of Iraq but he would be better off eating a box of exlax and riding an all night rollercoaster to prove his control. Just keep reviewing those old tapes of the fall of Saigon in the Viet Nam War. Then I think you will be able to understand where this is going!

Answer 5

so what is the point??

How about we leave and not hand over Iraq to the Insurgents?

Is it really that hard to understand?

Finish training the Iraqi Military and Police forces and then leave the country.



"leaving the country before the government can defend itself, is the same thing as handing over directly to the insurgents. (but I guess you are incapable of using the logic of a two year old)"

gosh, so why don't we actually train them to defend themselves and then leave, who is the two year old here??

Answer 6

Who are the Insurgants? They are possibly Syrians and Pakistani's. There is infighting between the two Iraqui tribes but if equal power is given to both rather than US propping up another pupet regime I am sure they will manage themselves quite well.

As for civil war between the two groups, should we care of they kill off each other? Eventually there wont be enough of them to kill on either side. They got what most wanted.. Saddam out ..now let them get on with rebuilding their own bridges.
I find it incredible that one man almost singlehanded, ruled the recalciterant tribes and held Iran at bay. Whilst all the troops and useless religious rhetoric poured out of the Bush adminsitration to justify his invasion into that country is a total failure. Get out now You didn't do any good in Vietnam and you aint any good there either. The days of US efficiency in waring is history! Queensbury rules and International conventions dont cut the mustard with the style of fighting employed by simple farmers and cameleers. These groups will win over technology and conventional warfare everytime.

In Vietnam the Vietnamese knew where americans soldiers were at anytime, they could smell the pomade and aftershave and see the gum wrappers and cigarette butts they dropped when on route march. Brains are not developed in the US forces, that's evident by the methods of training we see by drill masters feeding their minute egos with demanding respect and reducing thinkers to moronic robots and calling it discipline!
If you want to beat the Arabs, find alternative energy and let them have their oil. When it;s not wanted by the west anymore all they have to offer is sand and we dont need that!

Answer 7

I think they'd use the money to live like fatcats, rubbing elbows with Rusfeld, Perle, Wolfowitz, Cheney and Bush.

When all the braindead 'conservatives' realize that radical Islam is actually a response to despotic governance and maldistribution of wealth from natural resources, not a militant religious stance for its own sake, then we can begin to cure the illness of the middle east.

Answer 8

Of course they would. Islamic fanaticism is a cancer in the World. These people want death more then want life. The Islamic law to which they subscribe says that they can justifiably kill any infidel who does not convert to their religion. They think that their religion is the true religion of man. This is the same group who treats their women as second-class citizens making them hide their faces and bodies from the general public behind veils and full body coverings. Barbarians all of them...

Answer 9

Is that what they did before the invasion? Chances are they just want you out of their country now that you have ridded them of the WMDs.

Soon as you leave, Iran will just take over anyway.

Answer 10

I know what you mean, yes I would like to see the Troops leave Iraq someday, but I want to kick butt completely before we actually pull the troops outta there.