At some point, the GOP may reach some kind of point of Critical "loserness" - like a star about to Supernova and die. Do you think the party's there yet? Or, will it take a few more months of assault by Bush & the neocons to destroy it?
2007-07-07 14:12:28 · 21 answers · asked by Gemini 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The inner rot is finally starting to show. Massive doses of antibiotics (lies) are proving ineffective.
The US (and the world) will be a much better place when this party finally destroys itself.
About time.
2007-07-07 14:20:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The BungleBush reached a point of critical failure 30 years ago due to alcoholism which affects judgment and analysis centers of the brain. Even though an alcoholic may not have imbibed in a while, these impairments will persist. AA can help somewhat, but guess what?
Although AA is faith based, and so is the BungleBush's path, the BungleBush missed some important steps along the way.
The failure of the GOP is primarily due to the their perceived obligation to support a Republican president no matter how incompetent he may be in judgment or coherence. A leader who is too dependent on prayer in order to make judgment calls does not have judgment.
The more the GOP justifiably distance themselves from the BungleBush, the less chance they will be perceived as failures. If they continue their support of this judgment impaired lame duck, they will definitely reach "a critical mass of failure".
BTW, the BungleBush is not really a Republican - he is a Repugnant. Cheney is even worse so please don't go lame duck hunting.
2007-07-07 15:22:38 · answer #2 · answered by spirit dummy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like most political parties they have swung about as far right as they can so the GOP appears to be more radical that the country can stand so they will become the party out of power for a few years until people grow tired of the Dems.
Now before all of you conservatives start clicking negative to this response. Go the a history book and read it this is the way the government has acted since the start the longest that the GOP has held power has been from 1860-1912. The longest for the Dems is I believe 1932-1952.
What we are seeing the GOP standard bearers in the Senate have told the President that his actions are not going to take down the party. That to save the party he will be sacrificed, this is much like the Dems told Carter at the end of his administration.
2007-07-07 14:30:04 · answer #3 · answered by redgriffin728 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i discover it a snigger that the Pope helps the belief of the huge bang, in basic terms those that are far much less holy do no longer. as properly, the huge Bang does not perclude the existance of a author in case you could argue there is one it in basic terms provides the approach of how he did it. the reason that the huge bang is sensible is that the universe is increasing, via fact the universe is increasing, the day gone by it became smaller then it incredibly is immediately. Its no longer complicated math, neither is it complicated to understand. to respond to your questions i think that there is a serious mass. in case you have self belief in hawkins radiation (an pointed out phenomenon) then you definately comprehend that singularities decrease there mass. and supernovae take place do to it accomplishing a serious mass, I see no clarification why a huge singularity decays to a mass the place it may no longer help the pressures interior and it "explodes".
2016-09-29 07:00:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
See ya at the Ballot Box in 2008!!!!
If the Libs back their candidate as well as they did earth day concerts, we Republicans will win by more than the 3,000,000 Bush crushed Kerry by...
2007-07-07 14:15:45 · answer #5 · answered by Ken C 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The GOP is fine, quit worrying. Besides, they'll never, even in their worst moments, be able to match the Dems in bumbling, clueless, ineptness.
2007-07-07 14:26:30 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your congress is sitting at 23% approval rating.... I'd say your party is too far ahead for the republicans to catch up.
2007-07-07 14:20:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well with all of the Fred bashing that's been going on here in the past month, I doubt that even YOU believe your own question.
Face it. You're running losers and because of that, you deserve what you get. :)
2007-07-07 14:18:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I could really light into your ignorance with ease but I shall take the high road and let you know that the Grand old party is alive and very well, thank you!
2007-07-07 14:16:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Frankly, it needs some time in the Wilderness.
2007-07-07 14:19:05 · answer #10 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋