English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

we bring many pop r so called r n b singings across to the uk,hundreds and hundreds of people travel by car to get to london, and god know how many people watching at home, so how mush co did we use to show people that we should be cutting down on our co enmission, my first post

2007-07-07 12:35:15 · 19 answers · asked by dac0_7 2 in News & Events Other - News & Events

19 answers

Yes I am sure that the pussycat dolls performance will change the world forever. They probably think the environment is something you use to clean your teeth.

2007-07-07 12:38:59 · answer #1 · answered by ... 3 · 2 0

Music was good. The message was 'pants' and the whole cause is BS.

What the hell does a pop singer know about the environment anyway? They will support any thing they are told to providing they look good on TV. Should help some failing Carree's.

Nice to see Al Gore thinks he's a rock star. He will make a fortune out of this. The book, the tour and the speaking engagements. Great business to get rich.

2007-07-07 12:47:48 · answer #2 · answered by Jack 3 · 3 1

this whole saving the planet thing is all garbage......... it has been proven by the top scientists in the world that the planet is going through a natural cycle of its own. with all the people, factories and other stuff like that on earth we contribute about 1% of the co levels. but the government leading f.uck buckets wont have it and we have to pay for a natural phenomonon. AND for some reason there is a concert for it !!!!!!!!!! WHAT THE F.UCK???????????????????

2007-07-07 12:57:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No. Plain and simple- no. The whole thing is a sham to make rich people feel better about themselves. What do they know about the environment?

Why are they working so hard to put out a "planet-saving message" to us anyway? Go tell it to the Chinese- maybe get them to shut down their flipping factories. Now THAT would make a difference.

2007-07-07 13:06:18 · answer #4 · answered by kangaroo 4 · 0 0

It probably did the exact opposite for global warming than what they wanted.
But then perhaps they are looking long term.
David Grey cheeky fu**er said I feel like going to Gatwick and dragging people off the planes. Excuse me David Grey! Most people only fly once a year for a holiday they have saved all year for! To$$er telling us what to do!

Anyhow did apperciate Dave Grohl (foo fighters) Corr If you know what I mean. Whos with me ladies?

2007-07-07 13:08:43 · answer #5 · answered by babyshambles 5 · 1 1

To bad we can't get the same attention from the media and entertainment world to fight Islamic Radicals. If we don't stop them, then all that fluff and worry about CO2 is for nothing. That problem started 50-100 years ago and will continue for another 100 or so. Our way of life is at stake now.

2007-07-07 13:09:37 · answer #6 · answered by GABY 7 · 2 1

FOR GREED OF MONEY,ALL IS A FAILURE,WHEN YOU END ALL HUNGER ,YOU END ALL WARS,A CAN OF FOOD ,OR A PACKAGE OF SEEDS ,CHARGED AT ALL EVENTS ,WOULD SAVE ALL FROM DYING ON THE PASSING NEXT DAY,SICK WORLD,OIL IS THE CAUSE OF THE WARMING AS IT COOLS THE EARTH WITHIN THE WORLD ,AT THE CENTER OF THE CORE OF THE PLANET ,NOT MOLTEN LAVA,FOR WHY IS ALL BODIES OF WATER COLD AT THE BOTTOM OF ALL FLOORS OF THE WATER TABLE,AND ALL ON THIS DAY RE BREAKING THE 4TH COMMANDMENT,THOU SHALT NOT TAKE OUT FROM BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH ,OR BELOW THE SEA FLOOR,BRINGING MOTHER EARTH TO AN END

2007-07-07 15:36:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

sh1t,there are some cynical people on here.if you could harness the cynicism on y-answers,you could power a small country.you've got to speculate to accumulate...i think most people aren't aware that energy isn't 'free',and is costing the earth.the scientists are all wrong are they? lets just carry on regardless...till the floodwater's sweep down your road,keep believing its all a pr stunt.i do think over-population could be a factor,billions of us breathing out c/o-and farting methane,must have an effect.and if the projected total for 2060 is correct(9 billion) then we really are screwed............ anyway,the FOO'S ROCKED!!!

2007-07-07 20:11:37 · answer #8 · answered by thewmcmoppressed 3 · 0 2

Of course not. It helped save 'pop' careers but not much else.

2007-07-07 12:43:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

NO! Of course not. The majority of 'performers' there were rich, stupid, and patronising. Check their carbon footprint and see how 'green' they were (or weren't). It was a gigantic waste of money, time, and resources.

2007-07-07 12:50:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers