Rudy Giuliani will fight crime and illegal immigration, and he would fight the terrorists despite all the criticism there is. He will stand firm and not be waivered when the ACLU complains why we didn't read the Mexicans their rights in Spanish before chucking their asses across the border to where they belong. He is the one candidate who can do tough things. Bottom line, Iraq can't become South Vietnam!! America can't become North Mexico!! Rudy will see to it!!
2007-07-07 17:02:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by LaLyLoo 3
·
1⤊
4⤋
you have some heavily incorrect archives on your palms. there have been presidents of 11 diverse religions. All to boot Kennedy weren't protestant. did you comprehend that we've had a Jehovas Witness president in the previous??? there have been distinctive of each of here: Episcopalian Presbyterian Methodist Baptist Unitarian Disciples of Christ Dutch Reformed Quaker Congregationalist And one in each of each: Catholic Jehovah's witness Your 2nd little bit of undesirable information is that MORMONS ARE CHRISTIANS. Ever ask your self why this is noted as the "Church of Jesus Christ"????? unusual call for a non-Christian church. the genuine irony of the 2008 election is that Mitt is the main non secular candidate, jointly as many of the different applicants are affiliated with some Christian team or yet another, do no longer possibly prepare Christianity of their hearts (or so it seems) (e.g. Guliani, Clinton). Do maximum human beings comprehend that Harry Reid (democratic minority chief) is likewise a Mormon? Has he corrupted washington? we ought to continually choose for leaders which will vote for expenditures which will superb characterize what we choose for the rustic. the place does faith play into that? If somebody votes the way that i choose them to, i do no longer care in the event that they worship Santa Claus.
2016-10-01 02:40:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by arleta 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't seen anyone worth voting for yet! This is a very important election and we as a country really need to be very careful who we vote for as this country is divided and we need somebody who will bring this country together!
2007-07-07 12:56:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by G.W. loves winter! 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul is the only candidate worth voting for. He's never gone back on his word and his voting record proves that.
2007-07-07 13:02:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr.Robot 5
·
4⤊
3⤋
The one man who is not in the race as yet - the one true statesman in the political arena today - Professor Newt Gingrich - the author of the Contract for America, circa 1995!!! PS for cantcu: John F'ing Kerry was not awarded a CMH, that's BS!!!! A couple of Purple Hearts, one of which was self inflicted when he threw a grenade into a pile of rice & got blasted in the gluteaus maximus with the rice. Also, he served a total of 56 days in 'Nam & I doubt your stated credentials of service in 'Nam.
2007-07-07 12:32:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
6⤋
Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to introduce the president of the United States, Madam Hillary Clinton
(without a doubt, is the most expirenced candidate we have)
2007-07-07 12:56:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
7⤋
My 1st choice is Tom Tancredo and my 2nd choice is Mitt Romney
2007-07-07 13:08:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by MrCool1978 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I agree with you.
I would love Giuliani as president
2007-07-07 16:56:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by I hate Hillary Clinton 6
·
0⤊
5⤋
OK, Kerry wasn't governor f Massachusetts.
I have seen Mitt Romney in action...its not pretty.
I like Hillary in 2008, but if Al Gore runs, he gets my support 100%.
2007-07-07 13:12:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by James O'Leary 3
·
1⤊
6⤋
I am going to vote for Fred Thompson. He is the right guy for the job.
2007-07-07 13:13:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋