Deion Branch or Isaac Bruce?

Question

Which one would be a better fantasy option and why?

Answer 1

On paper, you go with Branch...

1. He's younger (much).
2. He's arguably the #1 WR in Seattle now.
3. Bruce is at best the third option behind Jackson, and Holt. They also signed Bennett and McMichael, so there aren't a ton of balls to go around.
4. Alexander turns 30, and with injuries is not the offesnive force that Jackson will be.

Neither guy is likely to produce double-digit TDs this year, but Branch has the higher potential to do so. There's less in his way (Hackett, Burleson, Engram, nothing special.)

Bruce is still decent, but hasn't had a great year since the late 1990s.

Answer 2

This is easy, Isaac Bruce will see more action than Deion Branch as far as touches. Tory Holt demands double covereage and Deion branch will be Hasslebacks 1# option. seattle will rely more on S Alexander and that will take opportunities away from the passing game. Stick with BRRRUUUUUCCCEEEEE!!!!

Answer 3

Branch

Answer 4

Issac Bruce because he has a good rapport with Bulger unlike Branch with Hasselbeck but with the departure of Jackson, Branch may do better but it would be a gamble

Answer 5

Deion Branch all the way....

Answer 6

close i would say deion, he just has better numbers. Im too lazy but if you really wanna know look at strength of schedule.

Answer 7

Its a hard one, but I would lean towards Bruce.

Answer 8

branch is a prick for leaving new england so bruce

Answer 9

Tough one. I think it's a push.