4x + ky = 7
kx + y = 0
Let's solve this by substitution. From the second equation, since kx + y = 0, then y = -kx, so plugging this into the first equation,
4x + k(-kx) = 7
Solving this,
4x - x(k^2) = 7
x(4 - k^2) = 7
x = 7/(4 - k^2)
Note that x is undefined if the denominator is equal to 0; that is,
4 - k^2 = 0
Solving this gives us
k^2 = 4
k = +/- 2
Which means k cannot equal +/- 2.
2007-07-07 07:50:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Puggy 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The matrix version of the problem is
AX = b
where A is a 2x2 matrix
[4, k; k, 1]
X is a vector variable
[x; y]
and b is a vector constant
[7; 0]
There will be a unique solution as long as A is non-singular.
There will not be a unique solution if A *is* singular.
For A to be singular
det(A) = 0
where det() is the "determinant" of a square matrix
for a 2x2 matrix [a, b; c, d]
det([a, b; c, d]) = ad - bc
Hence in your case
4*1 - k*k = 0
k^2 = 4
k = +/- 2
2007-07-07 07:47:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by none2perdy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Since you're in linear algebra, I assume you want this in terms of matrices.
Set the matrix:
A = [4 k]
[k 1]
and you want to have a consistent system of equations, meaning det(A) not 0. The only time that doesn't happen is when det(A)=0, and so you find:
det(A) = 4 - k²
set det(A)=0
4 - k² = 0
k = ± 2
Those are the only times det(A)=0, thus the only times your set of equations is inconsistent.
2007-07-07 07:47:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by сhееsеr1 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
First, treat it like 2 equations you are trying to solve. I'm going to multiply the second equation by -k and then add to the first equation:
-k^2x + 4x = 7
from which I get
(4-k^2)*x = 7
The only case for which I can't solve this is for k = 2 or k = -2
because (4-k^2) would become zero, and 0*x cannot = 7.
2007-07-07 07:45:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scott W 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
eqn. 1: 4x+ky=7
eqn. 2: kx+y=0
from eqn. 1, solve for y: y=(7-4x)/k
plug this into eqn. 2: kx +(7-4x)/k=0
after some algebra: (k^2)x+7-4x=0 => (k^2-4)x+7=0, or x=-7/(k^2-4)
which is real if and only if (k^2-4) is not equal to zero. Thus, k^2 cannot be equal to 4.
=>k is not equal to +/-2.
2007-07-07 07:52:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ian Sturdy 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
4x + ky = 7
-k²x - ky = 0----ADD
(4 - k²).x = 7
x = 7 / (4 - k²)
28 / (4 - k²) + ky = 7
ky = 7 - 28 / (4 - k²)
y = (7 / k) - 28 / k.(4 - k²)
y = [7.(4 - k²) - 28 ] / [ k.(4 - k²) ]
x and y will have solutions for k ≠ 2
2007-07-07 11:19:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Como 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can not have k = +/-2 since if this was so you will have
4x +2y = 7
2x +y = 0
or
4x -2y = 7
-2x + y = 0
These two sets of equations correspond to two parallel lines which of course do not intersect.
2007-07-07 07:43:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by olens 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
in (2) relation:
x=-y/k
replace x in (1) relation:
4(-y/k)+ky-7=0
-4y+k^2y-7k=0
yk^2-7k-4y=0
det=(-7)^2-4y(-4y)
det=49+16y^2
we got double square if:
det =0
16y^2+49=0 or 16y^2=-49 imp. → R
There's no solution for k.
2007-07-07 08:14:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Johnny 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
(4x+ky)/(kx+y) <> any integer
4x+ky divided by kx +y is an integer only when k = +/- 2.
2007-07-07 08:22:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by ironduke8159 7
·
1⤊
1⤋