How, exactly, did the man distinguish himself during his time in the Senate? And how does two decades as lobbyist for hire qualify him to be POTUS?
2007-07-07 06:26:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My point is that he more or less sat on his *** while he was in the Senate.
And how on earth is he a washington outsider? He spent seventeen years as a beltway lobbyist.
2007-07-07 06:32:18 · update #1
He is just an actor, and we had that in Ronnie Reagan with Nancy being the script writer!
2007-07-07 06:31:01 · answer #1 · answered by Old Guy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fred Thompson, is no outsider!!
HE is as inside as one can be as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Which another member of the CFR has to invite new members.
He is very much an elitist insider and a promoter of a one world government just as the CFR are doing...
2007-07-07 13:34:03 · answer #2 · answered by DONALD H 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, according to the Constitution, he is "qualified" to be POTUS. I love my country and my Constitution, and was a lobbyist at one time. It is a necessary and unjustly condemned endeavor that gives the citizens a way to make government hear their voices.
2007-07-07 13:33:47 · answer #3 · answered by panzernaker 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Fred Thompson is the ONLY Washington outsider with actual political experience.
That is how I see Fred.
2007-07-07 13:29:04 · answer #4 · answered by Shrink 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the same sense that Reagan was a lightweight, yes.
2007-07-07 13:28:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He left. This, in my book, makes him an outstanding Senator.
2007-07-07 13:29:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He has more experience than Hillary and obama. What is your point?
2007-07-07 13:30:07 · answer #7 · answered by GoGo Girls 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That would be Obama.
2007-07-07 20:05:15 · answer #8 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋