English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"YOU ARE EITHER WITH US OR WITH THE TERRORISTS",

Sitting back and slandering..is doing nothing..they need to vote to make changes yet they talk of impeachment..lie about alliances..have a jolly good time when our troops are in harm's way.

2007-07-07 03:43:19 · 10 answers · asked by UMD Terps 3 in Politics & Government Politics

dissent has to come from rational argument..not hyperbole

2007-07-07 03:44:00 · update #1

tough boys explain away suicide bomber payments and anthrax..
make excuses with intellectual laziness of dismissal..get good reliable sources from left's own bastions..and they say Rove and Bush are behind things.

2007-07-07 03:57:01 · update #2

10 answers

I sometimes find myself wondering the same thing. I mean let's be blunt and honest for a moment. Surely they can't WANT us to lose this war right? Surely they don't want our military members' sacrifices to be for naught. I mean, they're American right? And, as such, want America to succeed and be safe, right? I certainly hope so!

Perhaps they just don't understand what's truly at stake. We know they don't like to read the reports about why we should GO to war, how can we honestly expect them to research why we shouldn't LEAVE war.

No, here's what I think happened: I think they voted for war at the time based on what they thought was the popular thing to do. Remember that prior to the beginning of the war there was A LOT of support for it. Then, as the war waged on, the MSM started participating in their favorite pastime of attacking Bush, leaking classified information (wiretapping terrorists phones, tracking terrorist money etc) and demoralizing our troops. Holding a degree in psychology I can tell you that if you hear something enough, sooner or later you'll start to believe it. Now, 4 years later, the media has accomplished its goals and a lot of the public is against this war. And, in keeping in step with the DNC creed, the Dem politicians are calling for withdraw based on what people want to hear, not what's best for our country.

It's a sad, sad world.

2007-07-07 03:59:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Republican = Democrat Democrat = Socialist Liberal = average Republican & all Democrats there is not any distinction between the two events. Doubt this? look on the data and historic previous. The Repubs completely supported the Democrat's bailout initiatives which in essence socialized our financial device. FDR could be proud.

2016-10-01 02:06:10 · answer #2 · answered by shantae 4 · 0 0

Talk about irony... for the world's BIGGEST TERRORIST... that arrogant George Bush... to call anyone else a terrorist is even arrogant for HIM.

George Bush is the ANTICHRIST... and his misguided and idiotic policies are going to destroy the world if the Democrats don't stop him

I am all for impeaching that tyrant... that terrorist... that moron.. FOR TREASON... he and Cheney should be lynched when they are found guilty of Treason... not just merely impeached.

And... FOX NOISE NETWORK should be forced to carry the executions.

2007-07-07 03:46:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Well, you said it yourself... these are Bush's words.... He does not determine who are enemies are, both the legislative and executive share this determination... Given that the legislation is comprised of a majority of Dems then I would say that NO they are not in the terror network that you and Bush (although I seriously doubt that Bush agrees with you) are calling a network.

Please drop the 11 year old antics of Dems being terrorists... its really dumb.

2007-07-07 03:49:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

With less than 30% of Americans no longer supporting Bush and thus the war it looks like according to your/his definition the nation is full of "terrorists".

2007-07-07 03:48:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Bush...own words?..impossible. This is a trick question right.

2007-07-07 05:48:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I guess so if you trust the word of a Fascist to define who is and isn't a terrorist.

2007-07-07 03:53:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Hitler and the Nazis also liked to paint anyone who spoke out aganst them as enemies.

2007-07-07 03:49:02 · answer #8 · answered by brian2412 7 · 0 2

no need to say anything everyone else said it all

2007-07-07 06:26:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

shutup you insurgent

2007-07-07 03:47:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers