English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

saying that their leaders were not smart enough to make a educated decision? How can the Libs get away with this since they all voted for it anyway?

2007-07-07 02:44:08 · 22 answers · asked by georgedarookie 1 in Politics & Government Politics

22 answers

Ever heard of the manipulated intelligence? Downing St. memo ring a bell? Google them and you'll learn something today.

2007-07-07 02:55:40 · answer #1 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 2 3

Bush used an identical intellegence that congress observed, and that Clinton (bill) and Gore observed in 1998 while they endorsed going into Iraq. real, Obama replaced into against going into Iraq, yet he additionally suggested in 2007 that he observed no benefit in surging the troops, and all his advisors say a surge does not help interior the least. needless to say he replaced into incorrect, so he's able to being incorrect, and if ALL his advisors have been incorrect, do i've got faith them? no. the reality on Iraq is this. Agree or disagree on no count if we could desire to continuously be there and that's high-quality. yet in actual actuality, we are there, and we could desire to end. Whining approximately "we could desire to continuously not have long previous it" would not help the situation now. cope with the situation as is, don't be a monday morning quarterback. we are there, we could desire to win, as pulling out and thus surrendering will do greater lasting harm than something McCain has endorsed. information are often times unpleasent, yet they stay information.

2016-11-08 09:42:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Since the libs were all saying the same thing before Bush got elected, and since they were elected by their constitutes to make the right decisions, and since they voted to go into Iraq, their either saying they don't have any brains, or they don't belong in office. The blame game is easy. Making critical decisions isn't.

2007-07-07 03:28:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

There can be no legitimate argument for that. The Democrats were saying the same things Bush said about Iraq since before Bush was President. But some people respond to illegitimate arguments, and the Democrat politicians are playing to them. One thing they say is that Clinton thought Iraq had WMD, but unlike Bush, he didn't go to war over it. They say that as if it's proof that Bush was lying but Clinton wasn't when they said the same thing. But obviously, that doesn't prove that.

2007-07-07 02:57:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

They weren't duped, it was the faulty intelligence used by the people President Bush appointed to run the intelligence community. I blame the democrats for not having enough balls to stand up to our President. Instead they were too scared to be called un-patriotic by the republican propaganda machine. We were all duped by our government and they are both to blame for this fiasco in Iraq but our President holds the most blame. He had a hard-on to go after Saddam as soon as he was elected, nine-eleven gave him the means to carry out his mission.

2007-07-07 02:56:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I am an Independent, so I can say without a doubt ALL those who voted for this war in Iraq should NEVER be allowed back into office.
We pay them damn good money to look over with a fine tooth comb everything they vote on, I hold them ALL accountable ,do you?

2007-07-07 02:49:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

they are just gutless excuse makers that think they are tough-boys


the Joints Chiefs of Staff released a report in 1999..outlining:
150,000 pounds of Anthrax..Mobile tractor-trailers equipped with war-heads to deliver the anthrax..that the UN inspectors couldn't find before they were kicked out in 1998..

9-11..2001...give me a break..spinning that 9-11 had nothing to do with Iraq..is the truth..saying it did..is submitting the obvious as being duped into voting...

2007-07-07 02:59:06 · answer #7 · answered by UMD Terps 3 · 1 2

can anyone say 95% approval rating? There are a lot of liars on here...if 95% of people approved of what Bush was doing, then why do we have sooooo many on here saying they have ALWAYS been against Bush and his policies? That is undeniable proof of liars. No one was duped, and if they were then they are claiming to be duped my someone they CLAIM is retarded...lol

2007-07-07 02:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 3 2

Are you saying that I was on the floors of congress pushing my personal vote .....

Stupid question baseless fact and a poor attempt to try and lay blame where it doesn’t exists

Am I angry that my representatives allowed themselves to become blinded by political rhetoric, YES, I’m angry. Both Democrat and Republicans were lied to. Bush has reinvented the mission plan for Iraq repeatedly ever since we invaded and FINALLY other republicans are seeing that.

2007-07-07 02:55:14 · answer #9 · answered by phule_poet 5 · 2 3

Any dem who has flip flopped on the Iraq war should not be considered for President. When we start getting attacked in 09 by the jihadists, they will just use some standard Bush-bashes and blame the attacks on his bad policies, instead of doing anything themselves about it. Hillary and Edwards, gullible and stupid, want them for President? No. Lets not elect any senators and instead elect some ex-governors.

2007-07-07 02:49:30 · answer #10 · answered by Serpico7 5 · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers