ermmm I guess Hitler didn't have me like you do! :P
so what do u say???? partners?
p.s we will make a plan once we unite ^_^
2007-07-07 01:17:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
6⤋
I'm in the middle of a book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. It's a history book, and it isn't intended as a guide to how to take over the world, but I guess you could use it as one. It shows how Hitler almost did it.
Use violence to disrupt the activities of your political opponents, sometimes even assassinating them. This requires a sympathetic judiciary, to make sure you don't get punished for this. Stir up the passions of the electorate by scapegoating one group for the problems of the nation. Once in office, launch a terrorist attack against your own country, blame it on someone else, and use it as an excuse to get emergency powers. Then suppress the free press and emerse the populace in propoganda. Feel free to count on Democratic countries to appease you until it's too late.
You have to be prepared to assassinate your sidekick, if the time comes. So I'll decline the position.
Or it helps to do what some other former conquerers have done, and be born into the royal family.
I haven't gotten to the end of the book yet, so I don't know what it says about why Hitler didn't succeed. But I suspect it's just because he took on too much too soon. He should've waited to invade the USSR until he'd defeated England. And he should've gotten Japan to wait to attack the US until they'd defeated the USSR. Napoleon should've waited to invade Russia until he'd defeated the rest of Europe.
2007-07-07 10:48:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Trust me. You don't want to take over the world. The paperwork alone will kill you. And then you have to decide who to have taken out and shot, settle disputes among your lackeys and have everybody come whining on you when something goes wrong. It's a grind.
You need to scale down your plans to something more manageable. Steal enough to establish financial security for your old age. Take out a few of your more annoying neighbors. Build a pool of potential successors without naming any of them heir, so that they'll rat each other out rather than plotting against you together.
Then sit back and enjoy the finer things in Life. You don't really need to rule the World to be happy. Just have your own little corner where your every whim is responded to with instant, cringing subservience.
2007-07-07 08:35:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, first, you must posture yourself as being "the worker's ally." Play on class envy to incite the ill-informed mob. Promise the poor that they are entitled to something for nothing -- or that the greedy rich should be forced to pay their "fair" share. Develop an incremental scheme to lower the threshold for defining "rich." Tell the ignorant masses that "global consensus" favors them, not the selfish interests of the power elite systematically keeping them underprivileged; call for a U.N.-oriented policy.
Next, hype an imaginary global crisis; play on peoples fears. Hold pointless "events" that feature pop stars warbling about how we need to be more "aware". Demand that the "rich" pay an increasingly "fairer" share of the costs of the re-distribution scam you create to fight against
"The Global ______ Crisis". Call for socialized medicine, couching it in terms like, "Universal" or "Single-payer."
Once the saps are eating out of your hand, the rest should be easy. If your name is Hitlary or Osama, you might just stand a chance.
Remember: Never underestimate the utter stupidity of the electorate, they will be your willing pawns!
"Four legs good, two legs better!" - Animal Farm
2007-07-07 08:46:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tommy B 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Have you discovered an energy shield of some kind that can deflect all bullets and objects from encroaching within three feet of you .
If you have not done this then I would say the chances of you taking over the world are nil .
2007-07-07 08:41:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ask Muhammad and the boys cuz the Anti-American libs are pushing for radical islam to take over. (i guess they think if their nice, Muhammad will spare their respective be headings). Let's get back to 1 America cuz if it's another civil war here. You artsy fartsy Libs won't have a chance.
2007-07-07 08:43:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by georgedarookie 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Heres the plan 1.gather underwear 2.? 3.ruling the world
I have found this the best strategy ever in all of history Hitler didn't use this Americans did, it is as simple as that
Hitlers plan kill Jews gain power by research use people let only dominate race live rule world didn't work
Americas plan 1.make army that uses underwear. 2.? 3. win war.
2007-07-07 08:27:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jason B 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
numbers is the key you need people. and weapons. that's why the USA wont let any other country start using necular weapons.take china for example they are u.s.a's biggest threat because of the size of thair military. and the united states dont mess with china.quiet as it is kept.remember viet Nam.
2007-07-07 08:49:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The world is quite different than it was 60 years ago. Its not easily "taken over" by one man or a small groups of men. Your best bet - become the CEO of a huge corporation, and get together with other CEOs and politicians to form covert, behind the scenes group that runs things. Try and control the resources of various nations, and you will have control over a large share or the world's economy.
Oh, wait. There are already some people doing this.
2007-07-07 08:22:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1
·
1⤊
5⤋
". . . it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
2007-07-07 08:19:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Runa 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
If you want to take over the world, better get on the chimp's team - that pretty much sums it up for his administration and of course "his government".
2007-07-07 08:26:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋