opinions on why homosexual marriage can be a big no-no?

Question

if you disagree with it...please state your reasons and expand further your answer...

Answer 1

I am completely against it.
Marriage was meant for constructing a family, that includes reproduction and having children to raise in a healthy environment. If homosexuals want to do their thing, so will be it but please keep it away from the secret bond of matrimony.

Answer 2

Gay couples should enjoy the right to will property to one another, to have sex with each other, and to run their financial, personal and sexual lives as they see fit. They harm nobody and if this makes some people uncomfortable this is their own problem. However, the gay and lesbian activists are trying to smuggle in a package deal whereby the government will be required to impose regulations on private enterprise to, for example, offer health insurance benefits to the spouses of gay employees. They see gay marriage not as an end in itself, but as a means to the end of expanding our already massive, intrusive welfare-regulatory state. They want the government to force the private sector to do for gays what it has already done for straights--something the government has no business doing for either in the first place.

Answer 3

I am for homosexual marriage. If people want to make a life together, raise kids and care for each other, then they deserve the same legal protection as anyone else.

It takes time for people to change. Interpretations of scripture deal harshly with gays. And then there are homophobes who are really gay themselves that do anything to squelch any suspicion that they might appear gay - thus they fight pro-gay reforms.

Answer 4

Look up the word marriage anf you will see why gays cant partake in it.Civil ceromonies yes,marriage no

Answer 5

Gay marriage does not exist except in a handful of extremist jurisdictions. The vast majority of Americans support maintaining of the traditional definition of marriage (the union of one man and one woman). Every state which has voted on the issue has reflected this view. This traditional definition has existed for centuries and for the whole history of the US. It has been found to be OPTIMAL for society. It results in social stability, the production of future workers, soldiers, doctors and taxpayers and role modeling for the future generations. We should not change this time honored institution because a small and loud group demands that it be changed.