Could a Head of State use its national intelligence against the interest of its own citizens?

Question

I am and editor of writings at world social I have helped many writers like Simon K Hartfield ,Harry Sikanisari, Roberts M Winters, Salomo V M Pundai, Crrile R Q Pihap etc. Before commending anything or point to any writer I always go to the world , on of such is Yahoo, to know the truth about what authors say..I never allow imbecilities to be written to make sensations for some cents.By doing this I hope to be a guardian of moralities which can be corrupted in so many ways.

Answer 1

Theoretically, yes. .......

.....And, how's about, could a Group of Citizens use its' intelligence and strength and numbers and quote worldwide historical examples, that the Head of State be ineffective and ignorant about the hopelessness of his People ? And the majority in near-slavery because of the actions of this Group ?

In England, some say, this Group is called, " The Law".

Try the Site, www.slavery.org .uk

Some say, soon they will not have the outside of their penises wet ever again.

And their Non-Lethal Weapons will be destroyed. And them as well.

Try, www.thememoryhole

Answer 2

It was called Watergate The Guy President Richard Milhouse Nixon
Of Course, Tony Blair and The Invasion of Iraq runs a Close Second

Answer 3

Well various men and countries have been doing that for years, so my answer is yes.

I wouldn't use the opinions from people on Yahoo Answers whom you do not know to give advice to published authors.

I don't think that any one of us can become a guardian of moralities as you say you hope to do. It is too big of a job and men have free will.

Answer 4

Not only could they but they do. How else could George W.Bush have allowed the orchestration of 9/11 or Tony Blair 7/7. They don't rule for the benefits of their citizens, they rule for their own perceived interest of the country that put them into power. Bush needed Iraq's oil, 9/11 was an excuse to invade. Muslims had to be further demonised as support for the war declined, Blair obliged.

Answer 5

At this point, there have been four other answers, each of which I agree with completely. However, I am disappointed by your question for the simple reason that, by asking it, you have proved that there are still people 'out there' who think that politicians exist to serve the people. They don't! All politicians are interested in is accumulating money. Politicians will stop at 'nothing' to generate more money. My question is: what are they going to do with it all?

Answer 6

GOOD QUESTION...Of course. Do men have ego's?