English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

flames or frienship medals and congrats on their new nuc power plats,bombs to come?

2007-07-06 15:27:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

We need to be proactive NOT reactive. Take care of the problem now before crazy little man pushes the button.

2007-07-06 15:35:58 · answer #1 · answered by Cinner 7 · 1 2

If we leveled the whole area with a few tactical missiles, we would no longer have to worry - AND we could save many American military lives because they would never have to fight.

But, the libs would argue about the loss of civilian life just as they argue about the loss of American lives. They just aren't happy unless they're arguing about something. If I'd said the sky was blue, they'd argue that too.

So, it will never happen. Iran will continue with it's nuclear program thanks to their American sympathizers and some unlucky country is going to lose a city in less than 5 years. If it's us, watch the Dems scramble to blame a Republican, when they're the ones standing in the way most of the time.

But, I say, if they want a nuke so very badly, let's give them one. You can't compromise with the insanity of a fundamental extremist religious fanatic.

2007-07-06 22:40:09 · answer #2 · answered by Karma 6 · 0 2

well, we could start by telling Halliburten to stop helping them build their plants. and quit building Iran's infrastructure.
Federal law disallows American companies from transacting business with nations that sponsor terrorism, but foreign subsidiaries of such companies are not banned from such transactions. In May 2004, the U.S. Senate voted against legislation that would have stopped companies like Halliburton from using offshore subsidiaries to invest in Iran. The legislation was defeated in a 50-49 vote, mostly along party lines.

As CEO of Halliburton, Mr. Cheney lobbied the Clinton administration to ease sanctions on Libya and Iran, according to various news reports. "I think we'd be better off if we, in fact, backed off those sanctions [on Iran], didn't try to impose secondary boycotts on companies .. trying to do business there," Cheney told an Australian television interviewer in April 1998.3

According to the Financial Times, before he was elected (but after he resigned from Halliburton) Cheney "has said the company is allowed to operate legally in Iran through its foreign subsidiaries."4 "What we do with respect to Iran and Libya is done through foreign subsidiaries, totally in compliance with US law," Cheney told ABC Television's Sam Donaldson. When Donaldson suggested, "it's a way around US law," Cheney replied: "No, no, it's provided for us specifically with respect to Iran and Libya."5 If you're a big multinational that's able to incorporate around the world, you don't have to worry.

2007-07-06 22:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by Myles D 6 · 1 3

If you destroy their nuclear technology they will rebuild them and this time they will leave the NPT and do it more vigorously and "secretively".

2007-07-06 22:31:10 · answer #4 · answered by Page 4 · 1 2

maybe you should enlist now, so you can be finished with boot camp when the war starts.

2007-07-06 22:30:54 · answer #5 · answered by Gemini 5 · 1 2

Shoot them now that we have the chance.

2007-07-06 22:29:41 · answer #6 · answered by cynical 6 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers