Hilary Clinton. And I think her chances of winning the upcoming election are pretty good.
2007-07-06 15:26:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rudy Giuliani
2007-07-06 15:26:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary
2007-07-06 15:25:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by jrsygrl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fred Thompson.
2007-07-06 16:57:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by IMAGUY 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well I can't give you one answer as I would NOT decide until I was actually in the voting booth. BUT It would be either Rudy Giuliani or John McCain.
2007-07-06 15:28:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by GRUMPY 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fred Thompson. Really too early to judge if anybody has a chance, we still have another year to see which party will shoot themselves in the foot more.
2007-07-06 15:26:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd have to say Hillary Clinton. I think she would do well as president!
2007-07-06 15:31:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Oh, it's like that? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
John Edwards. he's a Democrate, yet Republicans like him too because of the fact of a few of his conservative ideals. i think of he could be an incredible chief then to tug at the same time the two events to get issues performed. there is too lots bi-partisan bickering happening in the Senate and residing house, and not something is getting performed. i like his plan to end poverty in u.s. in 30 years. I advise we placed alot of emphasis on poverty in different international locations, yet we fail to look on the homeless that stroll around aimlessly in our cities regular. The housing vouchers he helps for the homeless could be a good start up, because of the fact a good existence starts with a good foundation. He helps college for each individual. as long as you carry an element time job, the government will look after your classes, books, and expenditures. i think of it truly is motivation to have greater human beings, somewhat the undesirable, to get an training to greater proper their lives. As for the great subject perfect now, the warfare in Iraq, Edwards is familiar with that eliminating each and every of the troops from that country in one great go away could be a disaster for that country. Edwards might start up a steady shrink of troops. of direction, for the duration of the sluggish shrink of troops in that country, the timelines would be pushed greater on the Iraqi human beings to construct a staggering military and government. this might take greater American attempt from American generals and politicians to coach this country a thank you to grow to be greater self useful. Edwards states this could be an ongoing adventure even into the subsequent election via 2013. we can be there for awhile. yet there could be no troop improve because of the fact the Bush administration, or next republican canidates have stated. i've got appeared at each and every of the canidates, democrates and republicans, and with each and every of the subject concerns that make the main sense, John Edwards is a staggering canidate to look at to take us into the destiny. (As for the Kucinich guy, it truly is extreme-high quality and all, yet the place will the money come from?)
2016-10-20 03:17:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary, yes
2007-07-06 15:27:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton, I think she has a great chance.
2007-07-06 15:26:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by cptndaveahoe 6
·
0⤊
0⤋