English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think this is primarily a thermodynamics question but I am open to other kinds of scientifc explanation. Please do not give a global warming answer unless you can explain the mechanism or pont to the physical issues behind the locational shifts resulting in more flooding in some places and the growth of desertification in other places. I ask this Q seeking better answers than I have so I can explain the reason for the difference to others better than I can. This is a scientific Q, casual A's just don't cut it.

2007-07-06 14:16:44 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

5 answers

Global rainfall equals evaporation rate, averaged over time. If the climate gets hotter, the evaporation rate increases and, therefore, so does the rainfall, at least averaged over the planet. Heat also drives wind patterns, which can be complicated. The new greater rainfall would not necessarily be equally distributed, and in some places the rain might actually decrease.

2007-07-06 15:11:13 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 2 0

Earth’s climate is a chaotic system; it is far too complex for the kind of pat answer you seem to expect. World weather patterns are strongly influenced by such things as the Gulf Stream and the Himalaya Mountains, but no one factor is in control. We program all the available data into supercomputer models; yet different models come up with different results. This just proves we don’t have enough data or understanding to explain climate change. However, there is some agreement among all of our models; if they all predict drastic consequences of global warming, don’t you think we should try to prevent it?

2007-07-06 16:36:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

This IS a global warming question. You need to read up on the Partition Function in statistical mechanics. Environmental scientists warned us in the 1980's, that one of the most severe consequences of global warming would be that the jet stream would be altered which would cause our farms to potentially not get rain and the places we lived to get flooded.

My second sentence has the info you need to look up more rigorous answers that "cut it". But the bottom line is quit driving an SUV and tell your friends who do that they are idiots.

2007-07-06 15:17:33 · answer #3 · answered by Dennis H 4 · 2 0

might you be so sort as to characteristic a source. i detect this very exciting and can prefer to study it. As to the in-technique polarity shift, the earth's magnetic poles will shift, no longer the earth itself - nonetheless some have prophesized that there will be an earth shift - i think of Edgar Cayce - who reported that the earth's crust will slip 23 levels making NOrway the hot north pole. (or south pole, because it have been). (i think of it is oftentimes a effect of MRI searches via oil businesses who're finding for brand spanking new oil) i do no longer understand in the adventure that your concept varieties would be deformed, yet i think that it is possible. to apply sound to alter brainwave varieties, you prefer binaural beats, i think of. I actual have been suggesting for a mutually as that the chaos that exists immediately - in politics, economics, training, faith, and easy hassle-free decency would desire to be promptly related to the shift it is in technique. It isn't sensible to me how there would desire to be this sort of lot of people residing in delusionsal worlds. your suggestion actual explains that and supply a promise of an end to the madness in some hundred thousand years.

2016-12-10 04:23:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

to give the simplist answer possible, the amount of rainfall depends on other factors besides the amount of H2O on the planet

2007-07-06 19:10:06 · answer #5 · answered by brandon 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers