http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070706/pl_afp/irannuclearpoliticsus_070706191852
personally I stopped believing at "Do you want the proof of WMD in Iraq to come in the form of a mushroom cloud?"
the only mushroom cloud around is the small one she calls a hair style.
2007-07-06 13:54:17 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LOL dangerous since 1979. Well thats been a long time for him to WMD us dont you think. Iran is a real threat to US security. Jeez cant people think.
2007-07-06 14:08:56 · update #1
Iran is not dangerous. Not unless it was attacked.
Iran has not invaded any other country for 100 years. israel constantly wars with it's neighbours and has for the last 40 years occupied another country. Iran say they want nuclear for power generation only. israel has over 200 nuclear missiles. Iran has joined the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty; israel has not.
Who do you think is the most dangerous?
The US and israel have been caught out lying many many times. Why would anyone believe them now?
israel sunk the USS Liberty and there are serious questions yet to be answered about their involvement with the attack on Twin Towers. Remember that a dozen or more Mossad agents were captured by local police and held for over 3 months. They were release on presidential order.
What was that all about? Why were they held for so long? What did the local NY police force discover about these people who were cheering on the collapse of Twin Towers and the deaths of over 3000 innocent people?
Tell me, who is the most dangerous; Iran or israel?
2007-07-06 14:28:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If it was just Condi I would question it.
When the troops on the ground finding weapons from Iran.
When Lieberman a liberal is worried about Iran.
Listening to just what the president of Iran has said so far.
Considering his history storming embassies
Pulse other sources.
You bet I have concerns about Iran.
I guess for you the most important thing is to make sure democrats win in 08 no matter what the cost.
Me I rather have a country than bowing down to Meca or face losing my head.
That is the storm that is coming.
2007-07-06 14:17:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have believed they were dangerous since 1978, when the Shah was expelled.
Iran being dangerous is nothing new to those of us who have read the newspapers for the past oh, 30 or so years.
There is a lot more to the newspapers than the TV listings, the movie reviews, the horoscopes, and the gossip page.
2007-07-06 14:19:55 · answer #3 · answered by Jam_Til_Impact 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who doesn't believe that Iran WILL use a WMD if they get their hands on one is seriously naive. I suppose they are the same kind of people who leave their wallets in the seat of an unlocked car in the ghetto too, then act shocked and amazed when someone steals it.
2007-07-06 14:06:06 · answer #4 · answered by Karma 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In a world wide poll in late 2006,the vast majority of the world condiderd (s) Bush the most dangerous person in the world and quite amazingly citizens in countries allied with the US agreed by a majority as well.
Bush decides to wage an illegal war of choice based upon a pack of vfilthy lies that has seen the slaughter of at least 400,00 innocent Iraqis and Rice has the un-mitigated friggin gall to tell us Iran is dangerous???
Next she will be telling us that they have nuclear weapons and ones that can reach the shores of the US.
This is coming from a fawning Bush lover who aided and abetted ( if only by her silence) the entire administration in the torture and murder of prisoners the entire world was revolted by.
No it is Bush and Condi who are more dangerous than Iran is .
2007-07-06 14:04:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Wow, it amazes me the amount of people here who are truly blinded by their hate for our government.
Open up your eyes man! Seriously you can not like the G-Unit in the White House, but don't let your hate blind you.
Iran is a clear threat. There leader holds rallies just to enforce the evils of the west. The man is nuts!
2007-07-06 15:16:01 · answer #6 · answered by bigdaddy33 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe the Iranians ARE dangerous, but I don't think the way to stop them is to invade them or bomb them. The more we throw around our military, the more we prove everything bin Laden has been saying all these years. We need to show the Muslim world that bin Laden is WRONG about the United States, so that people will turn away from him and look at the US as potential allies, not deadly enemies.
2007-07-06 14:04:28 · answer #7 · answered by Chredon 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have thought that Iran was dangerous since 1979. Where have you all been?
2007-07-06 14:05:05 · answer #8 · answered by cashcobra_99 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I agree and its funny, Iran is dangerous now, because we removed his regional enemy that had kept Iran busy and focused their military in Iraq, fighting Saddam. And Halliburton helping to build Iran's infrastructure isn't helping much either.
however, Amidenajad is not Iran's leader, Iran is a Theocracy, the Ayatollah is their leader. Amidenajad's hardline anti-american party actually lost 2/3 of the elected seats in their parlament. AMidenajad is an old school terrorist, and is definately dangerous, but it is our presence in the region and the removal of Saddam that has emboldened him.
2007-07-06 13:59:43 · answer #9 · answered by Myles D 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
You damned well better believe they are dangerous that guy at the helm is a U.S. hater & if he had a WMD you can bet he would use it.
2007-07-06 14:00:51 · answer #10 · answered by Job1000 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋