5/1: I was hired by a company who hired a CRA to conduct a background check.
5/2: The CRA reported to the company that I was convicted of misdemeanor assualt, which is untrue. The company told me that I could dispute the CRA report before any adverse action is taken but the dispute must be resolved in 5 biz days. I disputed the CRA report in writing explaining that I have never been convicted of assualt and to contact the county to verify the records.
5/9: the CRA concluded their reivestigation. The CRA reivestigation stated they contacted the county and all the records initially reported was accurate preventing me from being hired by the company.
5/10: I hired a lawyer to contact the CRA. The CRA then amended their report saying I was never convicted of assault, but the comany had already taken adverse action and my application has already been terminated.
Did the CRA violate the FCRA because they did not actually verify the information with the county?
2007-07-06
11:17:21
·
4 answers
·
asked by
KpoBanker
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
cyanne, are you a lawyer and know this for sure?
2007-07-06
11:58:39 ·
update #1