i guess you missed the little announcement? hey, buddy, "mission accomplished"...it was in all the papers and everything! maybe you were out of town that year..."nothing to see here, america, move along and drop your paycheck in the tax bin...the one marked 'forward to haliburton'...insurgency? heck, that little thing? it's in its last throes, has been for YEARS...trust us, would we lie to you? after all, we told you about the WMD's and saddam's role in 9/11...c'mon, trust us...otherwise, the terrorists win"
2007-07-06 22:30:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by spike missing debra m 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are profound ameliorations between the severe Heaven and the decrease Heaven. Allegorically, water interior the severe Heaven flows freely (fifty 5:50), jointly as the water of the decrease Heaven desires to be pumped out (fifty 5:sixty six). Allegorically, the severe Heaven has all kinds of fruit (fifty 5:fifty two), jointly as the decrease Heaven has a constrained type of end result (fifty 5:sixty 8). ???? ????? ????? ?????? usually translated as "Then which of the advantages of your Lord will you the two deny" is a incorrect translation carefully contemplate at here [fifty 5:35] You get bombarded with projectiles of hearth and metallic, and you won't be able to win. Yusuf Ali On you would be sent (O ye evil ones twain!) a flame of hearth (to burn) and a smoke (to choke): no defence will ye have: Pickthal there'll be sent, against you the two, warmth of hearth and flash of brass, and ye won't get away. Shakir The flames of hearth and smoke would be sent on you 2, then you somewhat won't have the potential to shelter yourselves. Sher Ali There would be sent against you a flame of hearth, and molten copper; and you shall no longer have the potential to help yourselves. [fifty 5:40 3] this is Gehenna that the to blame used to disclaim. neither Jahannum nor bombardment of projectiles/thick smoke/flame of hearth can't be a blessing, hence the excellent suited translations is as follows fifty 5:34 Then, O women and men human beings! Which authority of your Lord will you deny? or fifty 5:34 Which of your Lord's marvels are you able to deny?
2016-10-01 01:12:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by sutliff 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We're supposed to get a report in September, 6 months after the surge began. I'm content to wait for that.
Remember, the Iraq government has only been in power for maybe 1 1/2 years. They have an incredibly hard task in setting up a new nation, fighting extremism and constant violence, let alone doing the normal things gov't does. Give them some time.
2007-07-06 11:07:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Uncle Pennybags 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
No 4 years is not enough. It took way longer than that to get this country going. You do not have the perspective needed to understand war. It takes time. You cannot just wave your hand and expect problems to go away.
The reason why so many feel this way is because every death and bombing is on every liberal news station. This should have been stopped had we had a president with a backbone to make tough decisions.
2007-07-06 12:36:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
it's the same old song and dance... "things are getting better you just have to wait" for 3 years now... I said ok... for the first year... I said "I'm getting a little tired of this" the second year" and since then I've just been sick of the whole situation, between slow reaction to the changing situation and the constant violence... it's all getting old...
2007-07-06 11:12:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
What are our alternatives? Leave? Is that one? I don't see it, if it is.
I think we are there. And our best hope lies in the ability of the Iraqi people to get their act together. Or we will get to stay there a very long time...
ADDED: Heck yes, it is getting old. But what are the choices? Because we have to pick from a plate of them, and live with our choice.
2007-07-06 11:12:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Shrink 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
yeah, it is. but we will have definite proof one way or the other, then. it's just to bad that its human lives that they are playing with, instead of poker chips.
i doubt that it will affect much. people are pretty much one way or the other right now.
2007-07-06 11:12:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They need to be a patient.
2007-07-06 11:07:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Don W 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
They are Bush appointees who are trying to buy time for the administration.
2007-07-06 11:09:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chi Guy 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
You are wrong. There is no time limit for victory. It will come when the terroist crazies give up.
2007-07-06 11:08:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
3⤊
2⤋