English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Although physicians take an oath to do so would or should they be let go if they refuse?
I just see pictures of the Scotland and London and New York suspects and think of the harm done or almost done to innocents. I am not sure I could do it. Maybe that makes me wrong?????

2007-07-06 11:02:24 · 6 answers · asked by scarletlady 1 in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

This is kind of a hard one for me because I very much believe in god but the human part of me says NO, I don't think they should have to save the life of a vicious killer , I even feel bad saying so but it is the honest to god way I feel.

2007-07-06 11:35:31 · answer #1 · answered by jdydewing 5 · 0 0

well 2 of the suspect are doctors so where does that leave us i say no don't blood treat them they don't give a stuff who they are hurting

2007-07-06 19:31:08 · answer #2 · answered by disco 3 · 0 0

Doctors are not "forced" to treat anyone. Their job is to treat- without judgement- whoever is set before them. As far as THEY are concerned, preserving life- is playing "God" ENOUGH... -without also having to decide who should live & who should die. THAT job- is left to the Politicians.

2007-07-06 18:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 0 0

to a doctor it is just a body that needs fixing.

2007-07-06 18:09:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Most doctors are not trained to defuse bombs.

2007-07-06 18:44:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well i wouldnt help him so i dont see why anyone should be made too. leave it to the indiviual

2007-07-06 18:29:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers