English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was selling my home in WV rent to own. The buyer refused to sign agreement after moving in so I am taking her to court to regain possession of my property. she has not paid rent/housepayment grace period ended as of june 1and the grass is way over grown (I am being cited to correct the yard or have the city do it for me). I went to the home and it looks as though no one could possible be living in the home (I can see dog poo on floors and would like to clean up the mess before it sets in with the summer heat.
Question here: Do I as the owner have the right (even though we do have a status conference scheduled in 2 weeks) to notify her that I will be entering the home within 24 hours to do an inspection? I would like to place a notice on the door and then send her an email since I am sure she is not living in the home. Can I do this legally? or can she flat out refuse to allow me into the home?

2007-07-06 10:58:43 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance Renting & Real Estate

Sunshine: I now know how poorly I have handled the whole situatio. The only reason why the agreement was not in writing before hand was because the lady wanted her law professor to draw up the agreement. We verbally explained to her we had no intentions on selling the home RTO but straight out so we would only do so under certain conditons for example She pays for all repairs and taxes each year and she has to keep the home clean and pay payment on time each time otherwise she would default. After many months of waiting for contract I did a written agreement myself which she flat out refused to sign because she did not want to pay taxes and wanted an extra 30 days on grace period. I understand how blind I was to just trust someone on their word. SHe did put a 2000 dolllars down payment on home and I never thought I would have to do a home inspection for I thought with RTO she would treat the home as her own..oh well we all live and learn.

2007-07-06 11:41:11 · update #1

4 answers

You can enter with a 24 hour notice. However, you can NOT touch anything (not even open a closed door) without her there to say it is OK. No cleaning either, no matter how bad.

A judge will rake you over the coals if you step out of line.

2007-07-06 11:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by Landlord 7 · 2 0

If you are still the legal owner of the premises and your contract indicates that she is a tenant until ownership takes over, you may treat her just as you would any tenant.

Your state law covers such notices, but I know of none where you need more than 24 hours advance notice. You are to assume that she still lives in the property and, accordinly, post your notice to enter on the front door of the property. Her fault if she's not there to read or open it.

I would advise taking along your digital camera and phographing the entire interior of the premises before you touch a thing. Should this get REALLY nasty, you do have some evidence of the situation.

2007-07-06 11:06:21 · answer #2 · answered by acermill 7 · 0 0

You have handled this very poorly. Don't compound your errors by now entering the unit. The time for her to sign paperwork was before she took possession of the unit, not after. Now you are facing a legal eviction. Anything you do, like entering the premises, will complicate things. You can mow the grass or hire a service and add it to the bill you will be collecting off her deposit/from court.

2007-07-06 11:03:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You do, with 24 hours written be conscious, have a contractual legal duty to enable them to return in. although, i might recommend the appointments must be at a jointly agreeable time, interior widely used working hours often. And it somewhat is a mute ingredient re although in case you gave be conscious, or they did. And below what situations. Frankly we've been given, with out warning and immediately, be attentive to an purpose to sell the valuables we would been in for over 13 years (particularly than do any upgrading!). if so I mentioned I wasn't chuffed to have potential shoppers over the valuables below the situations, although if I agreed that the brokers would desire to are available in to take photographs and so on. The proprietors of the valuables agreed to pass into opposite. This exchange right into somewhat diverse although - maximum landlords might choose to have a seemless exchange over, to stay away from 'down time' for the valuables. i think of anyone is entitled to 'quiet leisure' of the valuables they're renting, so if this vacationing will become disruptive then i might say so. you will possibly take your subject concerns, and the hire, on your community electorate suggestion human beings, who will inform you your rights.

2016-10-01 01:12:03 · answer #4 · answered by sutliff 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers