it was banned from TV im giving you all a chance to watch it their are 12 parts
2007-07-06 10:24:05 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=9%2F11+Coincidences+
2007-07-06 10:30:05 · update #1
i said watch it you ****** idiot
2007-07-06 10:50:31 · update #2
I have seen it and many others that all point out serious flaws with the *official version* Many who are satisfied with believing what they are told, by those that serve to gain the most from blind trust, are in denial. They cannot and will not accept anything that interferes with their artificial world. Someday they will find out the hard way and by then it will be too late for all of us. Until that day never stop asking and accept the fact that many will ridicule you for using intellect. The people that won't research nor listen to unbiased research will refuse to change. Any time spent trying to educate them is a futile act that they simply don't want to hear. It makes one wonder if had on 9/12/01 Bush said well we had to use controlled demolition so they wouldn't topple over, if the same people would have argued no, it was jet fuel that brought them down.
2007-07-06 13:36:31 · answer #1 · answered by John S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have seen the full length documentary and although it opened my eyes it also opened my mind. I think the docu is a bit over the top and sensationalised. If we think of coincidences - consider for a minute that 9/11 is also the emergency number 911. So is there any relationship?
2007-07-06 10:41:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
was it "banned", or was it just not aired on t.v. because they didn't send out the aluminum foil hats to the viewers?
All the rediculous accusations have been debunked. It is not hard to find them, if you look.
As for "coincidences", did you hear about all the coincidences between JFK and Abe Lincoln? OOOOHHH coincidences!!!!
You could coincide a romanian hooker with a california red wood tree if you thought long enough.
2007-07-06 10:31:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Post the link
2007-07-06 10:27:40 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All fundamentally flawed theories, mainly because no actually evidence supports any of it, none, nada and if there was any we would have heard about it long ago. Oh and I did enjoy the counter to Loose Change...Screw Loose Change, give that a look see and tell me what you think..
2016-05-20 00:36:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could post the most irrefutable evidence but people would find some way to dismiss it; most likely by calling you silly names
I myself don't believe the official story
2007-07-06 13:04:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
OK...how do you explain the lives lost on the airplanes? The pennsylvania crash? The other aircraft that were supposed to go that day, but didn't?
2007-07-06 10:48:34 · answer #7 · answered by EHFAR 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Go take your medicine before they have to put you back in your straight jacket.
2007-07-06 11:50:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋