Should Bush be impeached for the way he pronouces "nuclear"?

Question

I know we are all tramatized beyond belief, but now it's time to take back the word nuclear and find another president who can pronounce it.

By the way I'm not even going to read the stupid answers.

Answer 1

He pronounces it the same way John F. Kennedy pronounced it. Did anyone impeach JFK for his pronunciation of "nuclear"?

Answer 2

Many conservative loyalists tend to cherry-%. stats and evidence that favors their slant whilst ignoring the rest which could in all possibility run opposite to their view. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, it may be pronounced that impeaching Bush and Cheney this previous due in the 2d term is somewhat pointless. additionally, whether there have been sufficient evidence of a criminal offense, there are not adequate votes in the Senate to truly convict. Political bias is a extensive element in figuring out the end result, in basic terms because it became the final time around (Clinton).

Answer 3

I think we should impeach Bush for all his violations of the constitution. His punishment (aside from being thrown out of the White House and imprisoned) will be to listen to a tape on a continuous loop of him mispronouncing nuclear.

Answer 4

That would have been a good reason not to elect him, among other things, but now it's way too late for that. Besides, if you impeach Bush, you're left with President Cheney. Even the GOP doesn't want that!

Answer 5

Yes. For violating a Jimmy Carter Trademark.

And Carter had less of an excuse. He was an Engineering Officer in the Navy.

"Before I joined the Navy, I couldn't even spell nukilyer engenear. Now I are one!"

Answer 6

But why not, we read and responded to your stupid question. If you don't think your question was stupid, then please get off the computer and the Internet. You are stealing bandwidth from someone who could actually use it for a better purpose. But, if you must stay on the Internet, leave this site and go track down some celebrity gossip site to play on.

Answer 7

No, there are far better reasons to impeach him than that, but it won't happen. Let's just hope he doesn't do too much more damage between now and 2008.

Answer 8

If that is what Congress thinks it is there to do. Whatever.

But as an American, I really wish Congress would just be out there getting all the information they can to do what we elected them to do. Within the bounds of the US Constitution's separation of powers, of course.

Do we think the current Congress knows what their job is?

Answer 9

Are you that petty? This is not even worth dignifying with a response.

Answer 10

i tink dah english languidje is contiyoumously massacreed,spyndeled,foldid,misconstructitated,misspeld,oxymoronized,badly thunked out,murdalized,trunkated,demembered,defloweredated,mikstup,,so whutsrong wit dyat?