English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You show everyone all the crime and corruption going on and they always - always - go back to Clinton, FDR, Nixon, Kennedy

Why can't they just comment on the here and now and accept that their party is now corrupt and evil and thinks they are above the law.

The same law applies to the American people, why then shouldn't it apply to those we have elected!

The nightmare is going on today - not ten years ago - that's over!

2007-07-06 09:26:29 · 17 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

I know right. Just because someone else did wrong it excuses Bush/Cheney's evil deeds. Remember in 2000 he campaigned that he would bring honor back to the White House. LMAO!!!!!!!

2007-07-06 09:33:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The Democratic history is a peek into the future. It gives us an idea what to expect if a Democrap takes the office. And when you rip on the Prez, the closest Democrap prez (history wise) is Clinton. Just like if the Dems take office, and the Republicans start in on say Edwards (should he win), libs will probably use Bush as their comparrison. Why? Becuase hes the most recent Republican prez. Where's the confusion? Here, I'll write slower for ya.

By the way, Nixon was a Republican.

2007-07-06 09:43:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So you're saying the problem is here, and not 10 years ago? It's that misconception that we're trying to rectify when we point this stuff out. Bush has been losing my support for a long time, and finally sealed the deal when he supported the amnesty bill. That doesn't mean I'm not going to point out your hypocrisy for somehow believing that this is a NEW development in politics.

We don't live in the past. It would be nice if you actually tried to research the past though, because this has been going on for a long time and in both parties.

2007-07-06 09:33:12 · answer #3 · answered by Dekardkain 3 · 1 1

Right here and right now all the excuses are being prepared to lambaste the next democratic President. We all know taxes will have to be raised for this fiasco, our world image is devastated and our economy in my opinion is a paper tiger being held together with profits from this conflict. It's much easier to point at congress and Clinton than to face the truth.

2007-07-06 09:34:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

it ought to be over, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it nevertheless inspired our lives immediately. to no longer point out which you adult males attempt to apply a pair of folk to characterize many, generalizing, then accusing anybody of being corrupt, even nonetheless a similar can easily be reported of the different events. Oh, one extra situation, 10 years in the past, we could have prevented this entire situation if Clinton had in basic terms accomplished his activity and further Bin weighted down. If he had accomplished that, then enable's in basic terms say he would have saved the rest human beings alot of problem.

2016-09-29 05:23:19 · answer #5 · answered by pantano 4 · 0 0

Every day, in every way. The nighmare that's going on now is a direct result of the crime and corruption of the past.

2007-07-07 20:02:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

All politicians are above the law.

Where have you been hiding to not see people constantly complaining about it?

It doesn't take a political affiliation to affirm our government is worthless and filled with corruption.

2007-07-06 09:54:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't believe for a second that when someone questions the next corrupt democratic presidential administration, that you won't bring up George W. Bush.

2007-07-06 09:34:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

"Crazy Bush/Cheney supporters"? Excuse me, is there not another Clinton running for President? Oh, and isn't she dragging her husband around on the campaign trail with her? Maybe you should join us in the "here and now", some of us just don't want a repeat performance. Thanks

2007-07-06 09:34:49 · answer #9 · answered by rosi l 5 · 1 2

There wouldn't be a problem if Clinton had excepted Bin Laden's head instead of the head given by Monica.

2007-07-06 09:42:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers