2007-07-06 06:45:39 · 13 answers · asked by Alexander 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Yes, but I'm not sure which timezone.
2007-07-06 06:48:59 · answer #1 · answered by DT 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It all dependent what belief system you embrace.
Most likely if one does not believe the Theory of the big Bang ,and that its does not reperesent reality , then the BiG Bang never happened . That means it was a different kind of Phenomenon that did occur.
If you have positive proof that the Big Bang theory is realistic than time only began at the first mass structure interaction such as the Earth Sun motion indicating one year cycles.
If you are an analytical scientist, then you would define time as a quantity which determines how fast a process takes place. In that case time would be different for different processes. The formation time for constructing a basic mass would be different than for structuring complex mass structures.
A large event can take place all at the same instance of time.
Example if it took one day to build one house ,it would take the same one day to build one trillion trillion trillion houses;all part of the same event.
If we consider time to be relative;then we have to compare time at different parts of the Universe.Something science has not excatly achieved yet.
since we are onle able to measure time in local space,then we cannot measure time at the instance of the Universe Creation or even before that.
Since our Creator deals with Infinity we are not able to assign time to infinity. We are only finite Creations.We must understand our limitations.
2007-07-06 14:12:55 · answer #2 · answered by goring 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Time frames are relative and may not exist for all conditions. The earliest human recorded events date back around 4000 years back. So there wouldn't have been any time for the spectacular big bang ( although so far theory ).
2007-07-06 13:59:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Time is a concept that man created to help understand the progression of events through space. It started when it started, but not with the advent of the big bang - it started on earth and has been slowly modified since then to fit into scientific, mathematical, and spiritual models.
2007-07-06 13:51:31 · answer #4 · answered by Marko Ramius 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You presume that man was alive at the creation of everything by the Big Bang, and that he had evolved enough to design and manufacture digital watches to specify the time? Err-r,
could that supposition be in error? I think it might...
2007-07-06 15:07:22 · answer #5 · answered by zahbudar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not begining of time, infinity big bangs had happened.
2007-07-06 14:01:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
At the beginning of the universe, Earth did not exist, therefore midnight did not exist. Additionally, it's ALWAYS midnight somewhere on Earth . Either way you look at it, midnight is a meaningless idea at the beginning of the universe.
2007-07-06 13:51:38 · answer #7 · answered by lithiumdeuteride 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, Alex. And I might add that your recent questions surprise me. I would have expected such tripe from a full-fledged DOOfus, not you.
2007-07-06 17:11:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no that does not mean that at this era time like 00.00 does not exist and it is difficult to say at what did the bigbang occur
2007-07-06 15:10:53 · answer #9 · answered by Amy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all happened last night at around 12. I was sleeping by then.
2007-07-06 13:56:12 · answer #10 · answered by Frank V 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no it did not, time as we know it is a human created concept, Some scientist ow believe that the big bang was not the begining of the universe only the renewal of it from another universes' collapse
2007-07-06 13:49:57 · answer #11 · answered by Travis G 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋