English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I really think they would have been SCREAMING foul from day 1.

2007-07-06 06:29:19 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

If Clinton had started this war and this occupation in Iraq, knowing that Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9-11, the Republicans would have been screaming for his impeachment since the beginning.

2007-07-06 06:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 11 2

George Bush Sr. & Bill Clinton murdered more than 500,000 Iraqi children with their bombs, depleted uranium and sanctions. Nobody cared.

Clinton completed the RayGun agenda, finishing off the American Middle Class, creating a nation of rich and poor. Nobody cared

Clinton got head. This upset the Retardricans

Reading the Retardrican posts above....If their souls weren't rotten from self imposed stupidity; I could pity them their lack of cognitive abilities. Do they really think they are saying something? Evil incarnate Special Ed. style

2007-07-06 13:45:58 · answer #2 · answered by Peace Warrior 4 · 2 1

I wonder if Repubs are ever happy in politics? They stole 2 elections, ignored warnings for 9/11, wasted our whole surplus, wrecked the economy, lost zillions of jobs, borrow zillions from China and other places, started a war over WMD that didn't exist and everything else and they still yell about Bill Clinton!

2007-07-06 14:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by Mike H 6 · 3 2

No, Republicans pulled us out of Somalia after a helicopter was shot down. They don't have the courage to stand behind a president of the opposing party. All they know how to do is play petty politics.

2007-07-06 13:35:56 · answer #4 · answered by Jason 4 · 2 1

Your hypothetical is completely unrealistic. Clinton didn't have the cajones to launch a war. He stated many times in many different ways what a threat Sadaam was, and how he was attempting to get nuclear weapons, and even used the term weapons of mass destruction a couple of times. He even bombed an aspirin factory over there. He just didn't have the guts to actually take a stance. Very similar to the rest of his presidency.

2007-07-06 13:38:14 · answer #5 · answered by Brad the Fox 3 · 1 5

As if there's not enough for you to complain about, you want to complain about what Republicans MIGHT have said IF Clinton had invaded Iraq and got rid of Saddam? C'mon dude.

2007-07-06 13:34:33 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 2 4

Not to mention spending $500 billion taxpayer dollars on the fiasco to date, with at least another $500 billion needed before the US gets out.

2007-07-06 13:32:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 8 3

Ever here of Kosovo?, how about Bosnia?
We would support any battle against evil NO MATTER WHO THE PRESIDENT IS.
Unlike the left, we won't commit treason just cause we don;t like the president.
we also would never speak treason in other countries or support it for ANY reason.

2007-07-06 13:36:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

No, nor would anyone...regardless of political affiliation Iraq is a fiasco and a tragedy...

2007-07-06 13:34:08 · answer #9 · answered by walsh_patr 3 · 4 2

If Clinton has done ANYTHING in response to terrorism other than minimal retalitory strikes that just ticked the terrorists off more, then I would have been ECSTATIC!!!

Unforntunately, he did not.

2007-07-06 13:41:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers